CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Symmoria

Open-knowledge reference entry

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionOct 31, 2024
Entity authorityQ3507572
Source-derived summary

The symmoria (Greek: συμμορία, pl. συμμορίαι, symmoriai) was a group of wealthy citizens in Classical Athens during the 4th century BC, assessed together for the purposes of taxation.

Fiscal symmoriai

The symmoriai were first instituted in the archonship of Nausinikos (378/7 BC), when wealthy Athenian citizens, who were liable for the property tax known as eisphora, were grouped into such groups. The new measure was probably connected with the establishment of the Second Athenian League and the renewed conflict with Sparta that began in that year.

The number of the symmoriai is disputed, especially in view of the later establishment of the naval symmoriai, but 100 are mentioned by Kleidemos, and the number seems to correspond with other features of the Athenian fiscal system. It is generally assumed that the symmoriai formed units of approximately equal fiscal value, so that they paid equal tax. Due to the inevitable delays in collecting taxes from so many people, shortly after 360s BC, the proeisphora was introduced, whereby the three richest members–the hegemon (ἠγεμῶν, "leader") or protos (πρῶτος, "first"), after whom each symmoria was named, and the deuteros (δεύτερος, "second") and tritos (τρίτος, "third")—of each symmoria paid in advance the sum due from the rest. Each symmoria had a diagrapheus (διαγραφεύς), responsible for keeping and updating the group's register (diagramma, διάγραμμα). They were answerable to the city's ten strategoi, who were ultimately responsible for the symmoriai.

The metics were grouped into symmoriai of their own (metikoikai symmoriai, μετικοικαὶ συμμορίαι).

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Symmoria” as open-knowledge reference entry. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 246-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Symmoria, Open-knowledge and entry can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as open-knowledge reference entry. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Oct 31, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q3507572. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Symmoria”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Symmoria primary sources, Symmoria archive and Symmoria research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Symmoria”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Symmoria” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.