CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Syllipsimopodi

extinct genus of cephalopod

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 12, 2025
Entity authorityQ111158479 ↗
Source-derived summary

Syllipsimopodi is an extinct member of the cephalopod subclass Coleoidea originally interpreted to belong to the clade Vampyropoda, which includes octopuses (Octopoda) and vampire squids (Vampyromorphida). The type and only known species is Syllipsimopodi bideni, named in honor of US President Joe Biden, and to raise awareness of his climate change policies. The holotype fossil was found in the Bear Gulch Limestone deposit in the US state of Montana in 1988, and donated that year to the Royal Ontario Museum by B. Hawes, designated ROMIP 64897. The species lived during the (Carboniferous) Mississippian subperiod, 330.3 to 323.4 million years ago, pushing back the group of cephalopods by 81.9 million years.

Taxonomy

A subsequent study doubted the assignment of Syllipsimopodi to Vampyropoda and suggested it to be a junior synonym of Gordoniconus beargulchensis. The original authors still consider it to be a separate genus and species but suggested further analyses might be needed to firmly place it in Vampyropoda.

Description

Individuals were 12 cm (4.7 in) long and had 10 arms with suckers, with two of the arms being longer than the others. It is currently considered the oldest known vampyropod by some but certainly the oldest known cephalopod with biserial suckers on its ten robust appendages. The lead author of S. bideni states that it is possibly the only known vampyropod - if it really can considered one - that has 10 functional appendages, with all other species having eight arms, suggesting that their ancestors had ten arms. The arms measure to about ~2.1 to 2.4 mm wide at the midlength.

Editorial summary

“Syllipsimopodi” enters the record as extinct genus of cephalopod. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Syllipsimopodi, extinct and genus can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1988—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Syllipsimopodi, extinct and genus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Syllipsimopodi” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Syllipsimopodi, extinct and genus provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 12, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q111158479. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1988.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Syllipsimopodi”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Syllipsimopodi primary sources, Syllipsimopodi archive and Syllipsimopodi research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Syllipsimopodi”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Syllipsimopodi” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.