CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
EN/FR
Search
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Anthony Sweijs

Dutch sports shooter (1852-1937)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 25, 2023
Entity authorityQ4769 ↗
Source-derived summary

Anthony Ahasuerus Hendrik Sweijs (18 July 1852 in Amsterdam – 30 September 1937 in Rotterdam) was a Dutch sport shooter who competed in the early 20th century in pistol shooting. He participated in Shooting at the 1900 Summer Olympics in Paris and won a bronze medal with the Dutch pistol team.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Anthony Sweijs” is dutch sports shooter (1852-1937). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Anthony, Sweijs and Dutch, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1852, 1937, 1900—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1852-07-18. For this dossier, Anthony, Sweijs and Dutch is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “dutch sports shooter (1852-1937)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 25, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q4769. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1852, 1937 and 1900.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Anthony Sweijs”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Anthony Sweijs primary sources, Anthony Sweijs archive and Anthony research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Anthony Sweijs”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Anthony Sweijs” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.