CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Swedish Squash Open 2012

squash tournament held in Linköping Sweden

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 26, 2026
Entity authorityQ7654858
Source-derived summary

The Case Swedish Open 2012 is the 2012's Swedish Open, which is a tournament of the PSA World Tour event International (Prize money : 70 000 $). The event took place in Linköping in Sweden from 2 to 5 February. Grégory Gaultier won his first Swedish Open trophy, beating Karim Darwish in the final.

Prize money and ranking points

For 2012, the prize purse was $70,000.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Swedish Squash Open 2012” is squash tournament held in Linköping Sweden. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Swedish, Squash and squash, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2012—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Swedish, Squash and squash is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “squash tournament held in Linköping Sweden” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7654858. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2012.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Swedish Squash Open 2012”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Swedish Squash Open 2012 primary sources, Swedish Squash Open 2012 archive and Swedish research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Swedish Squash Open 2012”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Swedish Squash Open 2012” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.