CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Apache Subversion

advanced version control system

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 2, 2026
Entity authorityQ46794
Source-derived summary

Apache Subversion (often abbreviated SVN, after its command name svn) is a version control system. The software is distributed as open source software, under the Apache License. Software developers use Subversion to maintain current and historical versions of files such as source code, web pages, and documentation. Subversion is generally used to aid in the software lifecycle process, including code commits, binary releases, fault reporting and retraction, patch releases, and developer updates (including documentation). Subversion is an important tool in software development lifecycle tasks such as software versioning. It provides an easy command line or application-based way to commit, branch, revert, and release all sorts of files (not only source code), though it is most used by the software development community. Unlike Git, which it predates, SVN repositories are more often maintained on privately maintained servers. Subversion's goal is to be a mostly compatible successor to the previously more widely used Concurrent Versions System (CVS).

The open source community has used Subversion widely: for example, in projects such as Apache Software Foundation, FreeBSD, SourceForge, and from 2006 to 2019, GCC. CodePlex was previously a common host for Subversion repositories.

Subversion was created by CollabNet Inc., and first released in 2000.

Editorial summary

“Apache Subversion” enters the record as advanced version control system. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Apache, Subversion and advanced can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2006, 2019, 2000—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2000-10-20. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Apache, Subversion and advanced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Apache Subversion” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Apache, Subversion and advanced provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 2, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q46794. VIAF identifies the subject as 177165689. The Library of Congress control number is n2006066336. 3 of 6 selected statements include explicit references; 2 carry qualifiers and 1 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2006, 2019 and 2000.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Apache Subversion”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Apache Subversion primary sources, Apache Subversion archive and Apache research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Apache Subversion”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Apache Subversion” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.