Sum-free set
A is sum-free if the equation a+b=c has no solution with a, b, and c all in A

In additive combinatorics and number theory, a subset A of an abelian group G is said to be sum-free if the sumset A + A is disjoint from A. In other words, A is sum-free if the equation
a
+
b
=
c
{\displaystyle a+b=c}
has no solution with
a
,
b
,
c
∈
A
{\displaystyle a,b,c\in A}
.
For example, the set of odd numbers is a sum-free subset of the integers, and the set {N + 1, ..., 2N} forms a large sum-free subset of the set {1, ..., 2N}. Fermat's Last Theorem is the statement that, for a given integer n > 2, the set of all nonzero nth powers of the integers is a sum-free set.
Some basic questions that have been asked about sum-free sets are:
How many sum-free subsets of {1, ..., N} are there, for an integer N? Ben Green has shown that the answer is
O
(
2
N
/
2
)
{\displaystyle O(2^{N/2})}
, as predicted by the Cameron–Erdős conjecture.
How many sum-free sets does an abelian group G contain?
What is the size of the largest sum-free set that an abelian group G contains?
A sum-free set is said to be maximal if it is not a proper subset of another sum-free set.
Let
f
:
[
1
,
∞
)
→
[
1
,
∞
)
{\displaystyle f:[1,\infty )\to [1,\infty )}
be defined by
f
(
n
)
{\displaystyle f(n)}
is the largest number
k
{\displaystyle k}
such that any set of n nonzero integers has a sum-free subset of size k. The function is subadditive, and by the Fekete subadditivity lemma,
lim
n
f
(
n
)
n
{\displaystyle \lim _{n}{\frac {f(n)}{n}}}
exists.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Sum-free set” as a is sum-free if the equation a+b=c has no solution with a, b, and c all in A. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as a is sum-free if the equation a+b=c has no solution with a, b, and c all in A. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 30, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q3054917. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Sum-free set”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Sum-free set primary sources, Sum-free set archive and Sum-free research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Sum-free set”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Sum-free set” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.