CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Isotopes of sulfur

nuclides with atomic number of 16 but with different mass numbers

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ468081
Source-derived summary

Sulfur (16S) has 23 known isotopes with mass numbers ranging from 27 to 49, four of which are stable: 32S (94.85%), 33S (0.76%), 34S (4.37%), and 36S (0.016%). The preponderance of sulfur-32 is explained by its production from carbon-12 plus successive fusion capture of five helium-4 nuclei in the alpha process of nucleosynthesis.

The main radioisotope 35S is formed from cosmic ray spallation of 40Ar in the atmosphere. Other radioactive isotopes of sulfur are all comparatively short-lived. The next longest-lived radioisotope is sulfur-38, with a half-life of 170 minutes. Isotopes lighter than 32S mostly decay to isotopes of phosphorus or silicon, while 35S and heavier radioisotopes decay to isotopes of chlorine.

The beams of several radioactive isotopes (such as those of 44S) have been studied theoretically within the framework of the synthesis of superheavy elements, especially those ones in the vicinity of the island of stability.

When sulfide minerals are precipitated, isotopic equilibration among solids and liquid may cause small differences in the δ34S values of co-genetic minerals. The differences between minerals can be used to estimate the temperature of equilibration. The δ13C and δ34S of coexisting carbonates and sulfides can be used to determine the pH and oxygen fugacity of the ore-bearing fluid during ore formation.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Isotopes of sulfur” as nuclides with atomic number of 16 but with different mass numbers. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 207-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Isotopes, sulfur and nuclides can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as nuclides with atomic number of 16 but with different mass numbers. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q468081. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Isotopes of sulfur”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Isotopes of sulfur primary sources, Isotopes of sulfur archive and Isotopes research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Isotopes of sulfur”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Isotopes of sulfur” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.