CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Sudan–Syria relations

bilateral relations between Sudan and Syria

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 3, 2026
Entity authorityQ64175907
Source-derived summary

Sudan–Syria relations were established on 28 January 1957, when the ambassador of Syria to Sudan (resident in Cairo, Egypt), Abdel Rahman el-Azm, was accredited. Syria has an embassy in Khartoum, while Sudan has an embassy in Damascus.

Both nations are predominantly Muslim and are members of the Arab League. Sudan and Syria have maintained diplomatic and political ties since their independence in the mid-20th century, shaped by regional politics, pan-Arab unity, and external alliances.

History

Sudan and Syria established formal diplomatic relations on 28 January 1957 with the accreditation of Syria's ambassador to Sudan.

Regional context

Both countries joined the Arab League shortly after independence (Sudan in 1956, Syria as a founding member in 1945). Both are also part of the Non-Aligned Movement, participating in the First NAM Summit in 1961, which aimed to maintain independence from Cold War superpowers.

During the Cold War, Syria maintained close ties with the Soviet Union, which supported its military and economic sectors. Sudan, particularly in the mid-1970s, pursued closer ties with the United States to diversify its international partnerships and attract foreign investment.

Despite differing alignments, Sudan and Syria signed a Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT) on 7 January 2000, which entered into force on 1 September 2001, to strengthen economic cooperation.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Sudan–Syria relations” as bilateral relations between Sudan and Syria. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Sudan, Syria and relations.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1957, 1956, 1945, 1961—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Sudan, Syria and relations providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Sudan–Syria relations”, the useful work is to connect “bilateral relations between Sudan and Syria” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q64175907. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1957, 1956, 1945 and 1961.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Sudan–Syria relations”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Sudan–Syria relations primary sources, Sudan–Syria relations archive and Sudan research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Sudan–Syria relations”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Sudan–Syria relations” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.