CACrown ArchivesHistory · sources · collections
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Subsequence

binary relation between sequences (strings)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ1332977
Source-derived summary

In mathematics, a subsequence of a given sequence is a sequence that can be derived from the given sequence by deleting some or no elements without changing the order of the remaining elements. For example, the sequence

A

,

B

,

D

{\displaystyle \langle A,B,D\rangle }

is a subsequence of

A

,

B

,

C

,

D

,

E

,

F

{\displaystyle \langle A,B,C,D,E,F\rangle }

obtained after removal of elements

C

,

{\displaystyle C,}

E

,

{\displaystyle E,}

and

F

.

{\displaystyle F.}

The relation of one sequence being the subsequence of another is a partial order.

Subsequences can contain consecutive elements which were not consecutive in the original sequence. A subsequence which consists of a consecutive run of elements from the original sequence, such as

B

,

C

,

D

,

{\displaystyle \langle B,C,D\rangle ,}

from

A

,

B

,

C

,

D

,

E

,

F

,

{\displaystyle \langle A,B,C,D,E,F\rangle ,}

is a substring. The substring is a refinement of the subsequence.

The list of all subsequences for the word "apple" would be "a", "ap", "al", "ae", "app", "apl", "ape", "ale", "appl", "appe", "aple", "apple", "p", "pp", "pl", "pe", "ppl", "ppe", "ple", "pple", "l", "le", "e", "" (empty string).

Common subsequence

Given two sequences

X

{\displaystyle X}

and

Y

,

{\displaystyle Y,}

a sequence

Z

{\displaystyle Z}

is said to be a common subsequence of

X

{\displaystyle X}

and

Y

,

{\displaystyle Y,}

if

Z

{\displaystyle Z}

is a subsequence of both

X

{\displaystyle X}

and

Y

.

{\displaystyle Y.}

For example, if

X

=

A

,

C

,

B

,

D

,

E

,

G

,

C

,

E

,

D

,

B

,

G

and

{\displaystyle X=\langle A,C,B,D,E,G,C,E,D,B,G\rangle \qquad {\text{ and}}}

Y

=

B

,

E

,

G

,

J

,

C

,

F

,

E

,

K

,

B

and

{\displaystyle Y=\langle B,E,G,J,C,F,E,K,B\rangle \qquad {\text{ and}}}

Z

=

B

,

E

,

E

.

{\displaystyle Z=\langle B,E,E\rangle .}

then

Z

{\displaystyle Z}

is said to be a common subsequence of

X

{\displaystyle X}

and

Y

.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Subsequence” is binary relation between sequences (strings). The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Subsequence, binary and relation, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 355-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Subsequence, binary and relation is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “binary relation between sequences (strings)” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1332977. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Subsequence”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Subsequence primary sources, Subsequence archive and Subsequence research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Subsequence”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Subsequence” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.