CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Founding Clubs of the DFB

Wikimedia list article

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ315907
Source-derived summary

The DFB (Deutscher Fußball-Bund or German Football Association) was formed 28 January 1900 in Leipzig, German Empire. The commonly accepted number of founding clubs represented at the inaugural meeting is 86, but this number is uncertain. The vote held to establish the association was 64–22 in favour (86 votes). Some delegates present represented more than one club, but may have voted only once. Other delegates present did not carry their club's authority to cast a ballot.

Founding associations are believed to include the following:

Altonaer FC von 1893

FC Eintracht Altona

Ascherslebener SC 1898

Akademischer BC 1897 Charlottenburg

Akademischer SC 1893 Berlin

BTuFC Alemannia 90

Berliner FC 1893

BTuFC Britannia 1892

BFC Burgund 1896 Berlin

BFC Concordia 1895 Berlin

BFuCC Deutschland Berlin

BSC Favorit 1896 Berlin

BFC Fortuna 1894 Berlin

BFC Frankfurt 1885 Berlin

Friedenau SC Excelsior Berlin

BFC Germania 1888 Berlin

BFC Hertha 1892 Berlin

BFC Columbia 1896 Berlin

Berliner Sport-Club Komet

BFC Phönix Berlin

BFC Preussen 1894 Berlin

BFuCC Rapide 1893 Berlin

BFC Stern 1889 Berlin

BFC Tasmania 1890 Berlin

BTuFC Toscana Berlin

BTuFC Union 1892 Berlin

BTuFC Viktoria 1889 Berlin

BFC Vorwärts 1890 Berlin

1. Bockenheimer FC 1899

FC Brunsviga 1896 Braunschweig

FuCC Eintracht 1895 Braunschweig

FC Germania Braunschweig

ASC 1898 Bremen

Bremer SC 1891 (represented by Hamburg's Walter Sommermeier)

Club SuS 1896 Bremen

SC Germania 1899 Bremen

SC Hansa 1898 Bremen

KSV Simson Bremen

FV Werder 1899 Bremen (represented by Hamburg's Walter Sommermeier)

SV Blitz 1897 Breslau

Britannia Chemnitz

Dresdner FC 1893

Dresdner SC 1898

SC Erfurt 1895

FC Frankfurt 1880

Frankfurter FC 1899

Frankfurter FC Germania 1894

Frankfurter FC Viktoria 1899

Freiburger FC 1897

Hamburger FC 1888

SC Germania 1887 zu Hamburg

FC Hammonia 1896 Hamburg

FC St. Georg 1895 Hamburg

FC Victoria 1895 Hamburg

FC Association 1893 Hamburg

1. Hanauer FC 1893

Hanauer FG 1899

FC Viktoria 1894 Hanau

Deutscher FV 1878 Hannover

Karlsruher FV 1891

Phönix 1894 Karlsruhe

Karlsruher FC Südstadt

Leipziger BC 1893

FC Lipsia 1893 Leipzig

FC Olympia 1896 Leipzig

VfB Sportbrüder 1893 Leipzig

FC Wacker 1895 Leipzig

FuCC Victoria 1896 Magdeburg

FuCC Cricket-Viktoria 1897 Magdeburg

Mannheimer FC Viktoria 1897

Mannheimer FG 1896

Mannheimer FG Union 1897

Mannheimer FG Germania 1897

Mannheimer FV 1898

Mittweidaer BC

FC Germania 1899 Mühlhausen

FC Bavaria 1899 München

1. Münchner FC 1896

FC Nordstern 1896 München

SC Naumburg

VfB 1893 Pankow

1.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Founding Clubs of the DFB” as wikimedia list article. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1900, 1893, 1898, 1897—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Founding, Clubs and Wikimedia can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as wikimedia list article. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q315907. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1900, 1893, 1898 and 1897.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Founding Clubs of the DFB”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Founding Clubs of the DFB primary sources, Founding Clubs of the DFB archive and Founding research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Founding Clubs of the DFB”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Founding Clubs of the DFB” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.