CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Melichrus urceolatus

species of plant

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 27, 2025
Entity authorityQ73510 ↗
Source-derived summary

Melichrus urceolatus, commonly known as urn heath, honey gorse or cream urn-heath, is a species of flowering plant in the family Ericaceae and is endemic to eastern Australia. It is an erect shrub with narrowly lance-shaped leaves with deep grooves on the lower surface, white, cream-coloured or yellowish-green flowers, sometimes with a red or rose-pink tinge, and spherical greenish-white or purplish-brown fruit.

Description

Melichrus urceolatus is an erect, stiffly-branched shrub that typically grows to a height of 0.2–1.5 m (7.9 in – 4 ft 11.1 in), forms a lignotuber and has branchlets with soft hairs. The leaves are narrowly lance-shaped, 8–25 mm (0.31–0.98 in) long and 1.5–4.2 mm (0.059–0.165 in) wide, with a prominent mid-vein and deep grooves on the lower surface. The flowers are more or less sessile or on a short peduncle with five to eight egg-shaped bracts, and bracteoles 2.5–4.0 mm (0.098–0.157 in) long. The sepals are egg-shaped to elliptic, 4.5–6 mm (0.18–0.24 in) long and the petals are usually cream-coloured or yellowish-green flowers, sometimes with a red or rose-pink tinge, forming a tube 2.0–3.5 mm (0.079–0.138 in) long with slightly hairy lobes 3–4 mm (0.12–0.16 in) long. It flowers from March to November and the fruit is a flattened spherical, greenish-white or purplish-brown drupe about 4 mm (0.16 in) long.

Taxonomy

Melichrus urceolatus was first formally described in 1810 by botanist Robert Brown in his Prodromus Florae Novae Hollandiae. The specific epithet (urceolatus) means 'urn-shaped'.

Distribution and habitat

This species of Melichrus is found in Queensland, New South Wales and Victoria, where it grows in forest, woodland and mallee scrub.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Melichrus urceolatus” as species of plant. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1810—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Melichrus, urceolatus and species can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as species of plant. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 27, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q73510. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1810.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Melichrus urceolatus”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Melichrus urceolatus primary sources, Melichrus urceolatus archive and Melichrus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Melichrus urceolatus”?
  2. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Melichrus urceolatus” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.