Thomas Sturgess
Indian cricketer (1898-1974)

Thomas Moore Sturgess (24 September 1898 – 2 February 1974) was an Indian cricketer. A wicket-keeper, he played first-class cricket in India in the 1940s, having previously represented the Egypt national cricket team.
Biography
Born in Assam in 1898, Thomas Sturgess joined the Royal Flying Corps as a flight cadet in October 1916 and undertook his initial training at Denham and Oxford before being commissioned a Temporary Second Lieutenant on probation on 27 April 1917.
Following further training with No. 3 Reserve Squadron, No. 19 Reserve Squadron, and No. 10 Reserve Squadron in England, he was posted to France as a Flying Officer on 13 June 1917. Sturgess was next posted to his first and only operational unit, 41 Squadron RFC, which was based at Abeele, Belgium on 18 June 1917.
On 24 June 1917, Sturgess was flying F.E.8, A4925, on patrol when a piston rod broke and he force-landed behind German lines northeast of Zandvoorde but crashed on landing, breaking both right planes, though uninjured himself. He was captured by German soldiers and held at Karlsruhe, and repatriated home via Kingston_upon_Hull|Hull on 14 December 1918.
“Thomas Sturgess” enters the record as indian cricketer (1898-1974). Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Thomas, Sturgess and Indian can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Thomas Sturgess” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Thomas, Sturgess and Indian provides the most credible route into that argument.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q12983859. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1898, 1974, 1916 and 1917.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Thomas Sturgess”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Thomas Sturgess primary sources, Thomas Sturgess archive and Thomas research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Thomas Sturgess”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Thomas Sturgess” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.