Triadic closure
concept in network theory

Triadic closure is a concept in social network theory, first suggested by German sociologist Georg Simmel in his 1908 book Soziologie (Sociology: Inquiries into the Construction of Social Forms). Triadic closure is the property among three nodes A, B, and C (representing people, for instance), that if the connections A-B and A-C exist, there is a tendency for the new connection B-C to be formed. Triadic closure can be used to understand and predict the growth of networks, although it is only one of many mechanisms by which new connections are formed in complex networks.
History
Triadic closure was made popular by Mark Granovetter in his 1973 article The Strength of Weak Ties. There he synthesized the theory of cognitive balance first introduced by Fritz Heider in 1946 with a Simmelian understanding of social networks. In general terms, cognitive balance refers to the propensity of two individuals to want to feel the same way about an object. If the triad of three individuals is not closed, then the person connected to both of the individuals will want to close this triad in order to achieve closure in the relationship network.
Measurements
The two most common measures of triadic closure for a graph are (in no particular order) the clustering coefficient and transitivity for that graph.
Clustering coefficient
One measure for the presence of triadic closure is clustering coefficient, as follows:
Let
G
=
(
V
,
E
)
{\displaystyle G=(V,E)}
be an undirected simple graph (i.e., a graph having no self-loops or multiple edges) with V the set of vertices and E the set of edges. Also, let
N
=
|
V
|
{\displaystyle N=|V|}
and
M
=
|
E
|
{\displaystyle M=|E|}
denote the number of vertices and edges in G, respectively, and let
d
i
{\displaystyle d_{i}}
be the degree of vertex i.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Triadic closure” is concept in network theory. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Triadic, closure and concept, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “concept in network theory” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7839907. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1908, 1973 and 1946.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Triadic closure”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Triadic closure primary sources, Triadic closure archive and Triadic research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Triadic closure”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Triadic closure” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.