CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Doxander vittatus

species of mollusc

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ3703830 ↗
Source-derived summary

Doxander vittatus, the vitate snail, is a species of medium-sized sea snail, a marine gastropod mollusk in the family Strombidae, the true conchs.

Subspecies

There are five subspecies :

Doxander vittatus vittatus (Linnaeus, 1758)

Doxander vittatus apicatus (Man in 't Veld & Visser, 1993)

Doxander vittatus entropi (Man in 't Veld & Visser, 1993)

Doxander vittatus japonicus (Reeve, 1851)

Doxander vittatus campbelli (Campbelli, Griffith & Pidgeon, 1834)

Distribution

This species occurs in the Indo-Pacific off Fiji and also in the South China Sea.

Description

The adult shell size varies between 35 mm and 100 mm.

Phylogeny

In 2006, Latiolais and colleagues proposed a cladogram that attempts to show the phylogenetic relationships of 34 species within the family Strombidae. The authors analysed 31 species in the genus Strombus including Doxander vittatus (referred to as Strombus vittatus in their analysis), and three species in the allied genus Lambis. The cladogram was based on DNA sequences of both nuclear histone H3 and mitochondrial cytochrome-c oxidase I (COI) protein-coding gene regions. In this proposed phylogeny, Strombus vittatus, Strombus canarium (= Laevistrombus canarium) and Strombus epidromis (= Labiostrombus epidromis) are closely related and appear to share a common ancestor.

References

External links

"Doxander vittatus vittatus". Gastropods.com. Retrieved 29 March 2011.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Doxander vittatus” is species of mollusc. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Doxander, vittatus and species, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1758, 1993, 1851, 1834—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Doxander, vittatus and species is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “species of mollusc” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3703830. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1758, 1993, 1851 and 1834.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Doxander vittatus”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Doxander vittatus primary sources, Doxander vittatus archive and Doxander research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Doxander vittatus”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Doxander vittatus” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.