Storie index
Open-knowledge reference entry
The Storie index is a method of soil rating based on soil characteristics that govern the land's potential use and productivity capacity. Developed by R. Earl Storie at University of California, Berkeley in the 1930s as a method of land valuation, it is independent of other physical or economic factors that might determine the desirability of growing certain plants in a given location.
The evaluation is easy to be realized, being this an advantage of this method.
A variety of categories are comprised in few categories.
Four or five parameters are evaluated:
A: Soil depth and texture;
B: Soil permeability;
C: Soil chemical characteristics;
D: Drainage, Surface runoff;
E: Climate (only if it is not homogeneous, if so than it should not be included in the formula);
The index is calculated from the multiplication of these parameters, that is:
Sindex = A x B x C x D x E
The disadvantage of this method is that if we have a value of zero in any category, then the result will be zero and won't be suitable for using. Another disadvantage is that the ratings are subjective.
This methodology was updated in again in 2008 by O'Geen et al. to correct for some of the subjectivity. https://anrcatalog.ucanr.edu/pdf/8335.pdf
References
2 O’Geen, Anthony Toby, Susan B. Southard and Randal J. Southard. “A Revised Storie Index for Use with Digital Soil Information.” Publication 8335, University of California, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, September 2008.
The public source identifies “Storie index” as open-knowledge reference entry. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Storie, index and Open-knowledge.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Storie index”, the useful work is to connect “open-knowledge reference entry” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 31, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q7620019. The first chronological checks are 2008.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Storie index”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Storie index primary sources, Storie index archive and Storie research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Storie index”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Storie index” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.