Stolen Recordings
music label
Stolen Recordings is a British independent record label founded by two musicians, Paul Jones and Mérida Sussex and one artist, Rachael Robb, and is based in Tottenham, London. Stolen's first release was in May 2005. In 2009 they founded a publishing company, in association with Beggars Music, called "Stolen Publishing". Stolen's releases include albums by Thomas Cohen, Bo Ningen, East India Youth, Pete and The Pirates, and Serafina Steer.
Stolen Recordings won the Award for "Best Small Label" at the inaugural AIM Awards on 10 November 2011.
Artists
Thomas Cohen
Bo Ningen
East India Youth
Pete And The Pirates
JEFF The Brotherhood
Serafina Steer
Let's Wrestle
Screaming Tea Party
Race Horses
Hot Silk Pockets
Mathew Sawyer and the Ghosts
Catalogue
Thomas Cohen ‘Bloom Forever’ (SR083, LP / CD / DL) 2016
Thomas Cohen,"Bloom Forever" / "Honeymoon" (SR082, 12” / DL) 2016
East India Youth, 20,000 LEAGUES UNDER THE SEA (SR081, CD / DL) 2014
Bo Ningen & Savages, Words to the Blind (POPNSR01, LP / CD / DL) 2014
Bo Ningen, III (SR077, LP / CD / DL) 2014
East India Youth, "HINTERLAND" (SR076, 12” / DL) 2014
East India Youth, TOTAL STRIFE FOREVER (SR073, LP / CD / DL) 2014
East India Youth, "DRIPPING DOWN" (SR074, 10” / DL) 2013
Serafina Steer, Disco Compilation (SR068, 7” / DL) 2013
Serafina Steer, The Moths Are Real (SR063, LP / CD / DL) 2013
Bo Ningen, Line The Wall (SR060, LP / CD / DL) 2012
Race Horses, Furniture (SR058, LP / CD / DL) 2012
Race Horses, "My Year Abroad" (SR057, 7” / DL) 2012
Bo Ningen, "Live at St.
“Stolen Recordings” enters the record as music label. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Stolen, Recordings and music can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Stolen Recordings” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Stolen, Recordings and music provides the most credible route into that argument.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 13, 2024. The linked authority identifier is Q2480850. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2005, 2009, 2011 and 2016.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Stolen Recordings”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Stolen Recordings primary sources, Stolen Recordings archive and Stolen research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Stolen Recordings”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Stolen Recordings” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.