CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

STED microscopy

super-resolution microscopy technique that creates super-resolution images by the selective deactivation of fluorophores, minimising the area of illumination at the focal point and thus enhancing the achievable resolution for a given system

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 14, 2026
Entity authorityQ467358 ↗
Source-derived summary

Stimulated emission depletion (STED) microscopy is one of the techniques that make up super-resolution microscopy. It creates super-resolution images by the selective deactivation of fluorophores, minimizing the area of illumination at the focal point, and thus enhancing the achievable resolution for a given system. It was developed by Stefan W. Hell and Jan Wichmann in 1994, and was first experimentally demonstrated by Hell and Thomas Klar in 1999. Hell was awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry in 2014 for its development. In 1986, V.A. Okhonin (Institute of Biophysics, USSR Academy of Sciences, Siberian Branch, Krasnoyarsk) had patented the STED idea. This patent was unknown to Hell and Wichmann in 1994.

STED microscopy is one of several types of super resolution microscopy techniques that have recently been developed to bypass the diffraction limit of light microscopy to increase resolution. STED is a deterministic functional technique that exploits the non-linear response of fluorophores commonly used to label biological samples in order to achieve an improvement in resolution, that is to say STED allows for images to be taken at resolutions below the diffraction limit. This differs from the stochastic functional techniques such as photoactivated localization microscopy (PALM) and stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM) as these methods use mathematical models to reconstruct a sub diffraction limit from many sets of diffraction limited images.

Background

In traditional microscopy, the resolution that can be obtained is limited by the diffraction of light.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “STED microscopy” as super-resolution microscopy technique that creates super-resolution images by the selective deactivation of fluorophores, minimising the area of illumination at the focal point and thus enhancing the achievable resolution for a given system. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around STED, microscopy and super-resolution.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1994, 1999, 2014, 1986—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with STED, microscopy and super-resolution providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “STED microscopy”, the useful work is to connect “super-resolution microscopy technique that creates super-resolution images by the selective deactivation of fluorophores, minimising the area of illumination at the focal point and thus enhancing the achievable resolution for a given system” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 14, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q467358. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1994, 1999, 2014 and 1986.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “STED microscopy”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow STED microscopy primary sources, STED microscopy archive and STED research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “STED microscopy”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “STED microscopy” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.