CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Stigmella lapponica

species of insect

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 31, 2026
Entity authorityQ1762947
Source-derived summary

Stigmella lapponica is a moth of the family Nepticulidae found in Asia, Europe and North America. It was first described by the German entomologist, Maximilian Ferdinand Wocke in 1862. The larvae mine (feed inside) the leaves of birch (Betula species).

Description

The wingspan is 5–7 mm. The head is ferruginous-orange to blackish. The antennal eyecaps are whitish. The forewings are light fuscous with a somewhat oblique shining whitish-ochreous fascia at 2/3. The apical area beyond this darker purple-fuscous; cilia round apex ochreous whitish except at base. The hindwings are light grey.

Life history

Adults are on wing in May.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Stigmella lapponica” as species of insect. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Stigmella, lapponica and species.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1862—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Stigmella, lapponica and species providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Stigmella lapponica”, the useful work is to connect “species of insect” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 31, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1762947. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1862.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Stigmella lapponica”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Stigmella lapponica primary sources, Stigmella lapponica archive and Stigmella research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Stigmella lapponica”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Stigmella lapponica” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.