CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Stick and poke

traditionall tattooing method

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionFeb 8, 2026
Entity authorityQ108352738 ↗
Source-derived summary

Stick and poke, also known as hand poke, is a tattooing method which uses a single needle instead of a tattoo machine. Until the introduction of electric tattoo machines in the 19th century, hand-poking was a common tattooing method, alongside incision tattoos and subdermal tattooing.

Practitioners

In the modern day, stick-and-poke tattoos are often performed by young adult amateurs. Minors who are unable to obtain parental consent for a professional tattoo may receive stick-and-poke tattoos from peers. Incarcerated people may also give and receive stick-and-poke tattoos, an association which sometimes gives them the name of prison tattoos. Other groups associated with stick-and-poke tattooing include punks and bikers.

Within the tattoo industry, stick and poke is often stigmatized as unhygienic or unprofessional possibly because of its popularity among lay people for at-home tattooing. Other tattoo artists dislike the trendiness of the resurgent practice. However, professionals who practice stick and poke praise its "softness", intimacy, and transgressive nature.

Materials

Stick and poke tattooing requires a sharp object and a source of pigment; a handle may be attached to the sharp object for easier manipulation.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Stick and poke” as traditionall tattooing method. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 182-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Stick, poke and traditionall can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as traditionall tattooing method. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Feb 8, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q108352738. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Stick and poke”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Stick and poke primary sources, Stick and poke archive and Stick research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Stick and poke”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Stick and poke” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.