Steven J. Kachelmeier
American academic

Steven J. Kachelmeier is the Thomas O. Hicks Endowed Chair at the McCombs School of Business, The University of Texas at Austin. His research applies methods of experimental economics to issues in auditing, management accounting, and financial reporting.
Education and career
Kachelmeier received his B.B.A. in accounting from the University of New Mexico and Ph.D. in accounting from the University of Florida.
He began teaching at the University of Texas at Austin in 1988. His research and teaching interests include financial accounting, auditing, and experimental economics.
Kachelmeier has held the C.T. Zlatkovich Centennial Professor Chair (2003 – 2009), the Randal B. McDonald Chair (2009 – 2022) and the Thomas O. Hooks chair (2022- present) at the same university.
In 2022 he was named chair of the Accounting Department at the McCombs School of Business.
He was editor of The Accounting Review from 2008-2011.
Selected publications
Kachelmeier, Steven J., R. Alan Webb, and Michael G. Williamson. 2024.
“Steven J. Kachelmeier” enters the record as american academic. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Steven, Kachelmeier and American can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Steven J. Kachelmeier” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Steven, Kachelmeier and American provides the most credible route into that argument.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7614860. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1988, 2003, 2009 and 2022.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Steven J. Kachelmeier”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Steven J. Kachelmeier primary sources, Steven J. Kachelmeier archive and Steven research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Steven J. Kachelmeier”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Steven J. Kachelmeier” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.