Stephens' constant
mathematical constant related to the primes

In number theory, Stephens' constant expresses the density of certain subsets of the prime numbers. Let
a
{\displaystyle a}
and
b
{\displaystyle b}
be two multiplicatively independent integers, that is,
a
m
b
n
≠
1
{\displaystyle a^{m}b^{n}\neq 1}
except when both
m
{\displaystyle m}
and
n
{\displaystyle n}
equal zero. Consider the set
T
(
a
,
b
)
{\displaystyle T(a,b)}
of prime numbers
p
{\displaystyle p}
such that
p
{\displaystyle p}
evenly divides
a
k
−
b
{\displaystyle a^{k}-b}
for some power
k
{\displaystyle k}
. Assuming the generalized Riemann hypothesis, the density of the set
T
(
a
,
b
)
{\displaystyle T(a,b)}
relative to the set of all primes is a rational multiple of
C
S
=
∏
p
(
1
−
p
p
3
−
1
)
=
0.57595996889294543964316337549249669
…
{\displaystyle C_{S}=\prod _{p}{\bigg (}1-{\frac {p}{p^{3}-1}}{\bigg )}=0.57595996889294543964316337549249669\ldots }
(sequence A065478 in the OEIS)
Stephens' constant is closely related to the Artin constant
C
A
{\displaystyle C_{A}}
that arises in the study of primitive roots:
C
S
=
∏
p
(
C
A
+
1
−
p
2
p
2
(
p
−
1
)
)
(
p
p
+
1
+
1
/
p
)
.
The public source identifies “Stephens' constant” as mathematical constant related to the primes. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Stephens', constant and mathematical.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Stephens' constant”, the useful work is to connect “mathematical constant related to the primes” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q55731272. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Stephens' constant”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Stephens' constant primary sources, Stephens' constant archive and Stephens' research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Stephens' constant”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Stephens' constant” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.