Steinmetz curve
intersection of two cylinders

A Steinmetz curve is the curve of intersection of two right circular cylinders of radii
a
{\displaystyle a}
and
b
,
{\displaystyle b,}
whose axes intersect perpendicularly. In case of
a
=
b
{\displaystyle a=b}
the Steinmetz curves are the edges of a Steinmetz solid. If the cylinder axes are the x- and y-axes and
a
≤
b
{\displaystyle a\leq b}
, then the Steinmetz curves are given by the parametric equations:
x
(
t
)
=
a
cos
t
y
(
t
)
=
±
b
2
−
a
2
sin
2
t
z
(
t
)
=
a
sin
t
{\displaystyle {\begin{aligned}x(t)&=a\cos t\\y(t)&=\pm {\sqrt {b^{2}-a^{2}\sin ^{2}t}}\\z(t)&=a\sin t\end{aligned}}}
It is named after mathematician Charles Proteus Steinmetz, along with Steinmetz's equation, Steinmetz solids, and Steinmetz equivalent circuit theory.
In the case when the two cylinders have equal radii the curve degenerates to two intersecting ellipses.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Steinmetz curve” as intersection of two cylinders. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as intersection of two cylinders. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q60750719. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Steinmetz curve”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Steinmetz curve primary sources, Steinmetz curve archive and Steinmetz research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Steinmetz curve”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Steinmetz curve” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.