CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Starling equation

description of net flow of fluid across a semipermeable membrane

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJul 12, 2026
Entity authorityQ615297
Source-derived summary

The Starling principle holds that fluid movement across a semi-permeable blood vessel such as a capillary or small venule is determined by the hydrostatic pressures and colloid osmotic pressures (oncotic pressure) on either side of a semipermeable barrier that sieves the filtrate, retarding larger molecules such as proteins from leaving the blood stream. As all blood vessels allow a degree of protein leak, true equilibrium across the membrane cannot occur and there is a continuous flow of water with small solutes. The molecular sieving properties of the capillary wall reside in a recently discovered endocapillary layer rather than in the dimensions of pores through or between the endothelial cells. This fibre matrix endocapillary layer is called the endothelial glycocalyx. The Starling equation describes that relationship in mathematical form and can be applied to many biological and non-biological semipermeable membranes.

The equation

The Starling equation as applied to a blood vessel wall reads as

J

v

=

L

p

S

(

[

P

c

P

i

]

σ

[

π

p

π

g

]

)

{\displaystyle \ J_{v}=L_{\mathrm {p} }S([P_{\mathrm {c} }-P_{\mathrm {i} }]-\sigma [\pi _{\mathrm {p} }-\pi _{\mathrm {g} }])}

where:

J

v

{\displaystyle J_{v}}

is the trans endothelial solvent filtration volume per second.

L

p

{\displaystyle L_{p}}

is the hydraulic conductivity of the membrane

S

{\displaystyle S}

is the surface area for filtration, determined by gaps in the "tight junction" glue that binds endothelial cells at their edges.

[

P

c

P

i

]

σ

[

π

p

π

g

]

{\displaystyle [P_{\mathrm {c} }-P_{\mathrm {i} }]-\sigma [\pi _{\mathrm {p} }-\pi _{\mathrm {g} }]}

is the net driving force,

P

c

{\displaystyle P_{c}}

is the capillary hydrostatic pressure

P

i

{\displaystyle P_{i}}

is the interstitial hydrostatic pressure

π

p

{\displaystyle \pi _{p}}

is the plasma protein oncotic pressure

π

g

{\displaystyle \pi _{g}}

is the subglycocalyx oncotic pressure, which varies inversely with

J

v

{\displaystyle J_{v}}

and so stabilises

J

v

{\displaystyle J_{v}}

.

σ

{\displaystyle \sigma }

is Staverman's reflection coefficient, determined by the condition of the endothelial glycocalyx over the junction gaps.

Pressures are customarily measured in millimetres of mercury (mmHg), and the filtration coefficient in millilitres per minute per millimetre of mercury (ml·min−1·mmHg−1).

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Starling equation” as description of net flow of fluid across a semipermeable membrane. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 373-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Starling, equation and description can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as description of net flow of fluid across a semipermeable membrane. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jul 12, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q615297. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Starling equation”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Starling equation primary sources, Starling equation archive and Starling research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Starling equation”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Starling equation” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.