CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Stanford prison experiment

controversial 1971 psychological experiment

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 23, 2026
Entity authorityQ235089
Source-derived summary

The Stanford prison experiment (SPE), also referred to as the Zimbardo prison experiment (ZPE), was a controversial psychological experiment performed in August 1971 at Stanford University. It was designed to be a two-week simulation of a prison environment that examined the effects of situational variables on participants' reactions and behaviors. Stanford psychology professor Philip Zimbardo managed the research team that administered the study.

Participants were recruited from the local community through an advertisement in the newspapers offering US$15 (equivalent to $119.25 in 2025) per day to male college students who agreed to participate in a "psychological study of prison life". Twenty-four participants were chosen after assessments of psychological stability and then assigned randomly to the role of prisoners or prison guards. Critics have questioned the validity of these methods. Those volunteers selected to be "guards" were given uniforms designed specifically to de-individuate them, and they were instructed to prevent prisoners from escaping. The experiment started officially when "prisoners" were arrested by the real police of Palo Alto, California. During the next five days, psychological abuse of the prisoners by the "guards" worsened. After psychologist Christina Maslach visited to evaluate the conditions, she was troubled to see how study participants were behaving and treated and confronted Zimbardo.

Editorial summary

“Stanford prison experiment” enters the record as controversial 1971 psychological experiment. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Stanford, prison and experiment can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1971, 2025—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Stanford, prison and experiment.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Stanford prison experiment” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Stanford, prison and experiment provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q235089. Authority coordinates are 37.429, -122.173. None of the 2 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1971 and 2025.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Stanford prison experiment”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Stanford prison experiment primary sources, Stanford prison experiment archive and Stanford research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Stanford prison experiment”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Stanford prison experiment” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.