Typasius
Algerian saint

Typasius (Italian: Tipasio) (died 11 January 304) is venerated as a military saint by the Catholic Church. His feast day is 11 January.
Legend
The Passio Typasii records that Typasius was a veteran of Tigava (today El Kherba), in the Roman province of Mauretania Caesariensis. Called to service by Maximian against the native Quinquegentiani, who were revolting against Roman rule, Typasius, who had become a Christian, refused to participate in this campaign. He had retired from military life. This brought him in direct confrontation with the authorities. As his legend records:
He was forced into active service again by his praepositus, and along with other vexillarii
went to battle. But the day before the battle the emperor Maximianus had wished to make a
donative to the soldiers. That night the angel Gabriel visited most blessed Typasius and
advised him one after the other of all the things that were going to happen. Morning came, and
when Maximianus Augustus was making the role-call on the parade-ground and the name of the
most blessed Typasius was read out loud, he declined to accept the gold from the hand of
Maximianus and declared that he was a soldier of Christ.
“Typasius” enters the record as algerian saint. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Typasius, Algerian and saint can confirm, complicate or overturn.
Why this record matters
“Typasius” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Typasius, Algerian and saint provides the most credible route into that argument.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jan 30, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2663641. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Typasius”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Typasius primary sources, Typasius archive and Typasius research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Typasius”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Typasius” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.