Square root of 10
Irrational number

In mathematics, the square root of 10 is the positive real number that, when multiplied by itself, gives the number 10. It is approximately equal to 3.16.
Historically, the square root of 10 has been used as an approximation for the mathematical constant π, with some mathematicians erroneously arguing that the square root of 10 is itself the ratio between the diameter and circumference of a circle. The number also plays a key role in the calculation of orders of magnitude.
Characteristics
The 13th-century physician Abd al-Latif al-Baghdadi was noted by biographers to have compared "uncertainty in medicine to the mathematical impossibility of determining irrational numbers such as pi or the square root of ten". Specifically, in his Book of the Two Pieces of Advice (Kitāb al-Naṣīḥatayn) Abd al-Latif offered "as an example the surface of the circle or a square root such as that of ten", saying that "if someone says that the square root of ten is three, he cannot be counted as an arithmetician, and his words cannot be accepted".
The first sixty significant digits of its decimal expansion are:
3.162277660168379331998893544432718533719555139325216826857504... (sequence A010467 in the OEIS)
The decimal digits of its reciprocal are the same, though shifted:
1
10
{\displaystyle {\frac {1}{\sqrt {10}}}}
= 0.31622....
More than a million decimal digits of the square root of 10 have been published, with NASA having announced publication of the first million digits on April 1, 1994. As of December 2013, its numerical value in decimal had reportedly been computed to at least ten billion digits.
This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Square root of 10” as irrational number. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.
Why this record matters
The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as irrational number. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q135435507. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1994 and 2013.
The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Square root of 10”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Square root of 10 primary sources, Square root of 10 archive and Square research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Square root of 10”?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Square root of 10” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.