CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Square Peg Media

British publishing and event management company

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 15, 2026
Entity authorityQ16951027 ↗
Source-derived summary

Square Peg Media Ltd (SPM) is a publishing and event management company based in London, England, founded in 2005.

History of ownership

The company was formed in 2005 by Linda Riley and her partner Sarah Garrett to take over the business of g3 magazine, a publication set up by Garrett and Lisa Knight in 2001. Originally a free title, g3 was a lifestyle and listings publication for lesbians and bisexual women, which became a paid-for publication available nationally through newsagents in 2012. Since acquiring this title, SPM has added annually to its publications, events, and brand extensions.

The company split its products in 2013, and Square Peg Media is now solely owned by Garrett.

Publications and events

Under the new company structure, Square Peg Media started other publications and events focusing on diversity and inclusion:

Out In The City, begun in 2007, is a gay men’s magazine, which, like g3, began as a free title and is now available nationally as a paid-for magazine.

Diversity Careers Show, started in 2008 in London, is a diversity-specific careers event aimed at LGBT students, graduates and job-seekers nationwide to showcase the UK’s most inclusive recruiters.

As a brand extension of the Diversity Careers Show, SPM published Out at Work (OAW) magazine in 2008, a free publication supported by Stonewall, the lesbian, gay and bisexual rights charity. The OAW magazine and website is a career workplace guide aimed nationally at gay school leavers, graduates and diversity professionals.

Also in 2009, SPM launched the Alternative Parenting Show, sponsored by the London Women’s Clinic, which aims to showcase the various fertility services increasingly available to the LGBT community.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Square Peg Media” is british publishing and event management company. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Square, Media and British, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2005, 2001, 2012, 2013—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2005. For this dossier, Square, Media and British is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “british publishing and event management company” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 15, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16951027. 2 of 2 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2005, 2001, 2012 and 2013.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Square Peg Media”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Square Peg Media primary sources, Square Peg Media archive and Square research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Square Peg Media”?
  2. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
  3. Who created the surviving record, and for what administrative purpose?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Square Peg Media” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.