CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Split magnet

magnet built in two halves with a gap inbetween

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 4, 2026
Entity authorityQ16944050
Source-derived summary

A Split Magnet is a resistive electromagnet that is separated into two halves, with the small gap that divides the two sides allowing access to a strong magnetic field. The combination of an accessible gap and strong magnetic field allows for the research of how far-infrared particles scatter. In addition, the magnet can also rotate up to 90°, allowing for the magnet to become parallel to the floor. The magnet uses a combination of 28 MW, a current of 160,000 amps and 13380 liters of water (for cooling purposes) per minute used. The strongest (and only) split helix magnet in the world is currently located in Florida State University at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, and can generate a field of 25 tesla.

Applications

The magnet is well suited for studies into far-infrared scattering experiments, allowing for insight into the properties of certain materials. This includes the material's electronic structure, which determines its usefulness in electronics. This information can be used to further the development of smaller, more efficient computers.

However, the magnet is not limited to just infrared scattering experiments and can be used for much more, such as Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy and Electron paramagnetic resonance. These techniques allow for a greater understanding of different materials, with applications ranging from analysis of biological compounds to microscopic imaging.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Split magnet” as magnet built in two halves with a gap inbetween. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Split, magnet and built.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 219-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Split, magnet and built providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Split magnet”, the useful work is to connect “magnet built in two halves with a gap inbetween” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 4, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16944050. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Split magnet”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Split magnet primary sources, Split magnet archive and Split research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Split magnet”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Split magnet” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.