CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Spinal fracture

fracture affecting the vertebrae of the spinal column

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 21, 2026
Entity authorityQ7577460
Source-derived summary

A spinal fracture, also called a vertebral fracture or a broken back, is a fracture affecting the vertebrae of the spinal column. Most types of spinal fracture confer a significant risk of spinal cord injury. After the immediate trauma, there is a risk of spinal cord injury (or worsening of an already injured spine) if the fracture is unstable, that is, likely to change alignment without internal or external fixation.

Types

Cervical fracture

Fracture of C1, including Jefferson fracture

Fracture of C2, including Hangman's fracture

Flexion teardrop fracture – a fracture of the anteroinferior aspect of a cervical vertebra

Clay-shoveler fracture – fracture through the spinous process of a vertebra occurring at any of the lower cervical or upper thoracic vertebrae

Burst fracture – in which a vertebra breaks from a high-energy axial load

Compression fracture – a collapse of a vertebra, often resulting in the form of a wedge-shape due to larger compression anteriorly

Chance fracture – compression injury to the anterior portion of a vertebral body with concomitant distraction injury to posterior elements

Holdsworth fracture – an unstable fracture dislocation of the thoracolumbar junction of the spine

Distraction is where there is a pulling apart of the vertebrae. Distraction injuries generally cause breaks in osseous and ligamentous supporting structures, and are therefore generally unstable. A distraction injury on the posterior side of a vertebra can lead to a compression fracture on its anterior side.

Cervical fracture

A medical history and physical examination can be sufficient in clearing the cervical spine. Notable clinical prediction rules to determine which patients need medical imaging are Canadian C-spine rule and the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS).

The AO Foundation has developed a descriptive system for cervical fractures, the AOSpine subaxial cervical spine fracture classification system.

The indication to surgically stabilize a cervical fracture can be estimated from the Subaxial Injury Classification (SLIC).

Editorial summary

“Spinal fracture” enters the record as fracture affecting the vertebrae of the spinal column. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Spinal, fracture and affecting can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current 311-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Spinal, fracture and affecting.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Spinal fracture” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Spinal, fracture and affecting provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 21, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7577460. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Spinal fracture”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Spinal fracture primary sources, Spinal fracture archive and Spinal research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Spinal fracture”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Spinal fracture” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.