CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Sphegina bilobata

Species of fly

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 31, 2026
Entity authorityQ109465065 ↗
Source-derived summary

Sphegina (Asiosphegina) bilobata is a species of hoverfly in the family Syrphidae found in Myanmar. It's set apart from other species by its general pale yellowish color with three black longitudinal stripes on the scutum combined with the infuscated pattern at cross veins on the wing. The male sternite IV with its symmetrical pair of short spinose lobes posteriorly is quite distinct.

Description

In male specimens, body length is 7.5 to 7.8 millimeters and wing length is 6.0 to 6.2 millimeters. The face is yellow, strongly concave with a strongly developed, brownish frontal prominence. The gena is shiny yellow; frons and vertex dull black; lunula yellow; occiput dull black; antenna entirely yellow; thorax dull yellow or yellowish; scutellum yellow or yellowish brown, shiny, trapezoid; pro- and mesoleg yellowish; protarsus and tarsomere 5 on mesotarsus brown; metaleg with coxa brownish, trochanter yellow, femur yellow with the apical 1/6 brownish and a ventrally interrupted annulus on the basal 1/2 weakly brownish, tibia with an apico-ventral tooth, colour yellow except the apical 1/5 brown and an annulus on the basal 1/2 brownish, tarsus brown. The wings are hyaline with yellowish stigma and brownish pattern. The basal flagellomere is enlarged, nearly 1.5 times as long as broad, and the arista is short and pilose.

Female specimens are much the same except for normal sexual dimorphism; body length is 8.4 millimeters and wing length is 7.5 millimeters. Protarsus yellow with tarsomere 5 obscure brownish yellow.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Sphegina bilobata” is species of fly. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Sphegina, bilobata and Species, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current 240-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Sphegina, bilobata and Species is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “species of fly” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 31, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q109465065. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Sphegina bilobata”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Sphegina bilobata primary sources, Sphegina bilobata archive and Sphegina research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Sphegina bilobata”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Sphegina bilobata” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.