CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Spank the monkey

2003 card game by Peter Hansson

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 18, 2026
Entity authorityQ16962218
Source-derived summary

Spank the Monkey is a card game created by Peter Hansson, in which players are workers at a junk yard. A monkey has climbed the highest scrap pile, and it is each player's job to climb the scrap pile and bring down the monkey by spanking it.

Gameplay

The goal of the game is to build a tower of the same height as the scrap pile on which the monkey resides. The tower is built by playing Junk-cards, each of which has a height and a strength. The junk can be reinforced by playing reinforcement-cards. When the player's tower has reached the height of the monkey, that player may try to spank it by rolling a die. If successful, that player wins the game. It is easiest to spank the monkey from exactly the same level, but it is also possible to do so from above.

Players can also attack other players' towers using attack-cards. They can be one of throwing attack, hand attack and sneak attack.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Spank the monkey” is 2003 card game by Peter Hansson. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Spank, monkey and card, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current 167-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Spank, monkey and card is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “2003 card game by Peter Hansson” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q16962218. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Spank the monkey”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Spank the monkey primary sources, Spank the monkey archive and Spank research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Spank the monkey”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Spank the monkey” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.