South African Class 18 2-10-2
class of 2 South African 2-10-2 locomotives

The South African Railways Class 18 2-10-2 of 1927 was a steam locomotive.
In December 1927 and January 1928 the South African Railways placed two Class 18 three-cylinder steam locomotives with a 2-10-2 Santa Fe type wheel arrangement in service on the Witbank-Germiston coal line.
Manufacturer
The Class 18 2-10-2 Santa Fe type steam locomotive was designed by Colonel F.R. Collins DSO, Chief Mechanical Engineer (CME) of the South African Railways (SAR) from 1922 to 1929, and built by Henschel and Son in Germany. Two locomotives were delivered in 1927 and 1928, numbered 1360 and 1361.
Characteristics
They were very powerful three-cylinder locomotives. At the time, three-cylindered locomotives were being built in appreciable numbers in Europe and America. Factors in their favour were their more even turning moment, improved balancing and better distribution of crank-pin thrust. Drawbacks were increased complexity and higher repair cost.
When delivered, the third cylinder was clearly visible, but plating was subsequently added beneath the smokebox and hid it from view. These were the most powerful non-articulated steam locomotives to see service on the SAR, with a tractive effort of 53,650 pounds-force (239 kilonewtons) at 75% boiler pressure and capable of hauling loads of 1,800 long tons (1,829 tonnes) over the ruling gradient of 1 in 100 (1%) on the Witbank-Apex section.
The public source identifies “South African Class 18 2-10-2” as class of 2 South African 2-10-2 locomotives. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around South, African and Class.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “South African Class 18 2-10-2”, the useful work is to connect “class of 2 South African 2-10-2 locomotives” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 27, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q2204882. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1927, 1928, 1922 and 1929.
Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “South African Class 18 2-10-2”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow South African Class 18 2-10-2 primary sources, South African Class 18 2-10-2 archive and South research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “South African Class 18 2-10-2”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “South African Class 18 2-10-2” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.