CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Source Code for Biology and Medicine

scientific journal

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionApr 25, 2023
Entity authorityQ22661195
Source-derived summary

Source Code for Biology and Medicine was a peer-reviewed open-access scientific journal in the field of bioinformatics, including information systems and data mining. The journal was published by BioMed Central and was established in 2006. The editors-in-chief were Emmanuel Ifeachor (University of Plymouth) and Leif E. Peterson (The Methodist Hospital Research Institute).

Abstracting and indexing

The journal is abstracted and indexed in Chemical Abstracts Service, EmBiology, and Scopus.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Source Code for Biology and Medicine” as scientific journal. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA sound reference starting point where classification, measurement and the date of the underlying evidence remain visible. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2006—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 2006-01-01. The account is most persuasive where Source, Code and Biology can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the science & nature register because the source frames it as scientific journal. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The date and method of observation matter as much as the stated conclusion, especially where classification or consensus has changed. The source revision retrieved here is dated Apr 25, 2023. The linked authority identifier is Q22661195. 4 of 4 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2006.

Critical limits

Scientific names, classifications and consensus can change while older terminology persists in catalogues and historical literature. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Source Code for Biology and Medicine”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Source Code for Biology and Medicine primary sources, Source Code for Biology and Medicine archive and Source research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Source Code for Biology and Medicine”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Source Code for Biology and Medicine” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.