CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Sophia Lillis

American actress (born 2002)

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 22, 2026
Entity authorityQ39048667 ↗
Source-derived summary

Sophia Lillis (born February 13, 2002) is an American actress. She gained prominence for her roles as Beverly Marsh in the horror films It (2017) and It: Chapter Two (2019) and as a teenager with telekinesis in the Netflix drama series I Am Not Okay with This (2020).

Lillis has also appeared in the HBO psychological thriller miniseries Sharp Objects (2018), the film Dungeons & Dragons: Honor Among Thieves (2023), and the HBO comedy thriller series The Chair Company (2025).

Early life

Sophia Lillis was born on February 13, 2002, along with her fraternal twin brother, Jake. Lillis and her parents appeared in a 2012 episode of The Real Housewives of New York City in which Jake, a bilateral above-knee amputee, was presented with hybrid running legs by Aviva Drescher.

Career

Early work

Lillis made her film debut starring in the 2016 film 37. Previously, she had a minor role in Julie Taymor's stage production of William Shakespeare's A Midsummer Night's Dream, which was also filmed for live showings. She is an alumna of the Lee Strasberg Theatre and Film Institute.

Breakthrough

In 2017, she rose to prominence after co-starring as one of the lead characters, Beverly Marsh, in the horror film It, an adaptation of Stephen King's novel of the same name. Directed by Andy Muschietti, It also starred Jaeden Martell, Finn Wolfhard, Wyatt Oleff, Bill Skarsgård, Jack Dylan Grazer, Jeremy Ray Taylor, and Chosen Jacobs.

Editorial summary

“Sophia Lillis” enters the record as american actress (born 2002). Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Sophia, Lillis and American can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewStrongest as a route into the people, institutions and dated events that shaped the subject’s public record. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2002, 2017, 2019, 2020—that can be checked directly. The authority record carries competing date values—2002-02-13, 2002-02-12, 2002-01-01—which should remain separate until their references and qualifiers are resolved. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Sophia, Lillis and American.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Sophia Lillis” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Sophia, Lillis and American provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 22, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q39048667. VIAF identifies the subject as 37151594469305352610. The Library of Congress control number is no2018004076. 4 of 5 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 1 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 2002, 2017, 2019 and 2020.

Critical limits

Public reputation and documentary evidence do not always develop together; absence from a summary is not evidence of historical absence. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Sophia Lillis”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Sophia Lillis primary sources, Sophia Lillis archive and Sophia research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Sophia Lillis”?
  2. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
  3. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Sophia Lillis” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.