CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Shalom Almond

Australian documentary filmmaker

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 10, 2026
Entity authorityQ137133047
Source-derived summary

Shalom Almond is an Australian documentary filmmaker. Her first feature documentary was The Love Market (2009), about the girls living on the street in Vietnam. She is especially known for two documentary films about women in the Adelaide Women's Prison, Prisoners and Pups (2018), and Songs Inside (2024), which won several awards.

Early life and education

Shalom Almond was born around 1978.

She attended Blackwood High School in the Adelaide Hills, and studied filmmaking at the University of South Australia, graduating in 1998/1999, when she was just 20.

Almond lived in Belair as a young woman.

Career

Film

Almond is a writer, director, and producer who has been working in the industry in Adelaide, South Australia, since she was 20 years old, having just graduated from university.

In 1998, a short film made by Almond and filmmaking partner Tamsin Sharp, Scrabble, won Best

Script and the Film Makers' Choice awards, and was named the Most Outstanding Film at the South Australian Young Film Makers Festival.

In June 1999, Almond, along with David Lipschitz and Tamsin Sharp, made a documentary film to accompany an exhibition of Jewish history in Adelaide in the Migration Museum, Tree of Life. The film was screened on ABC Television's Snapshots as well as Channel 9's Postcards series.

Editorial summary

“Shalom Almond” enters the record as australian documentary filmmaker. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Shalom, Almond and Australian can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—2009, 2018, 2024, 1978—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Shalom, Almond and Australian.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Shalom Almond” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Shalom, Almond and Australian provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q137133047. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 2009, 2018, 2024 and 1978.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Shalom Almond”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Shalom Almond primary sources, Shalom Almond archive and Shalom research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Shalom Almond”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Shalom Almond” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.