CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Sommerfeld radiation condition

used to solve the Helmholtz equation

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 6, 2026
Entity authorityQ902719 ↗
Source-derived summary

In applied mathematics, and theoretical physics, the Sommerfeld radiation condition is a concept from theory of differential equations and scattering theory used for choosing a particular solution to the Helmholtz equation. It was introduced by Arnold Sommerfeld in 1912

and is closely related to the limiting absorption principle (1905) and the limiting amplitude principle (1948).

The boundary condition established by the principle essentially chooses a solution of some wave equations which only radiates outwards from known sources, disallowing arbitrary inbound waves propagating in from infinity.

The theorem most underpinned by the condition only holds true in three spatial dimensions, in which the power of a wave is inversely proportional to the square of the radial distance. This is not the case in two dimensions. On the other hand, in four or more spatial dimensions, power in wave motion falls off much faster in distance.

Formulation

Arnold Sommerfeld defined the condition of radiation for a scalar field satisfying the Helmholtz equation as

"the sources must be sources, not sinks of energy. The energy which is radiated from the sources must scatter to infinity; no energy may be radiated from infinity into ... the field."

Mathematically, consider the inhomogeneous Helmholtz equation

(

∇

2

+

k

2

)

u

=

−

f

in

R

n

{\displaystyle (\nabla ^{2}+k^{2})u=-f{\text{ in }}\mathbb {R} ^{n}}

where

n

=

2

,

3

{\displaystyle n=2,3}

is the dimension of the space,

f

{\displaystyle f}

is a given function with compact support representing a bounded source of energy, and

k

>

0

{\displaystyle k>0}

is a constant, called the wave number. A solution

u

{\displaystyle u}

to this equation is called radiating if it satisfies the Sommerfeld radiation condition

lim

|

x

|

→

∞

|

x

|

n

−

1

2

(

∂

∂

|

x

|

−

i

k

)

u

(

x

)

=

0

{\displaystyle \lim _{|x|\to \infty }|x|^{\frac {n-1}{2}}\left({\frac {\partial }{\partial |x|}}-ik\right)u(x)=0}

uniformly in all directions

x

^

=

x

|

x

|

{\displaystyle {\hat {x}}={\frac {x}{|x|}}}

(above,

i

{\displaystyle i}

is the imaginary unit and

|

⋅

|

{\displaystyle |\cdot |}

is the Euclidean norm).

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Sommerfeld radiation condition” as used to solve the Helmholtz equation. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA concise reference frame for defining the subject, testing terminology and identifying the institution closest to the evidence. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1912, 1905, 1948—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Sommerfeld, radiation and condition can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as used to solve the Helmholtz equation. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 6, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q902719. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1912, 1905 and 1948.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Sommerfeld radiation condition”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Sommerfeld radiation condition primary sources, Sommerfeld radiation condition archive and Sommerfeld research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Sommerfeld radiation condition”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Sommerfeld radiation condition” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.