CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Soft heap

variant on the simple heap data structure that has constant amortized time for 5 types of operations

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 13, 2026
Entity authorityQ7553986
Source-derived summary

In computer science, a soft heap is a variant on the simple heap data structure that has constant amortized time complexity for 5 types of operations. This is achieved by carefully "corrupting" (increasing) the keys of at most a constant fraction of values in the heap.

Definition and performance

The constant time operations are:

create(S): Create a new soft heap

insert(S, x): Insert an element into a soft heap

meld(S, S'): Combine the contents of two soft heaps into one, destroying both

delete(S, x): Delete an element from a soft heap

findmin(S): Get the element with minimum key in the soft heap

Other heaps such as Fibonacci heaps achieve most of these bounds without any corruption, but cannot provide a constant-time bound on the critical delete operation. The amount of corruption can be controlled by the choice of a parameter

ε

{\displaystyle \varepsilon }

, but the lower this is set, the more time insertions require: expressed using Big-O notation, the amortized time will be

O

(

log

1

/

ε

)

{\displaystyle O(\log 1/\varepsilon )}

for an error rate of

ε

{\displaystyle \varepsilon }

. Some versions of soft heaps allow the create, insert, and meld operations to take constant time in the worst case, producing amortized rather than worst-case performance only for findmin and delete. As with comparison sort, these algorithms access the keys only by comparisons; if arithmetic operations on integer keys are allowed, the time dependence on

ε

{\displaystyle \varepsilon }

can be reduced to

O

(

log

log

1

/

ε

)

{\displaystyle O(\log \log 1/\varepsilon )}

or (with randomization)

O

(

log

log

1

/

ε

)

{\textstyle O({\sqrt {\log \log 1/\varepsilon }})}

.

More precisely, the error guarantee offered by the soft heap is the following: each soft heap is initialized with a parameter

ε

{\displaystyle \varepsilon }

, chosen between 0 and 1/2. Then at any point in time it will contain at most

ε

n

{\displaystyle \varepsilon \cdot n}

corrupted keys, where

n

{\displaystyle n}

is the number of elements inserted so far. Note that this does not guarantee that only a fixed percentage of the keys currently in the heap are corrupted: in an unlucky sequence of insertions and deletions, it can happen that all elements in the heap will have corrupted keys. Similarly, there is no guarantee that in a sequence of elements extracted from the heap with findmin and delete, only a fixed percentage will have corrupted keys: in an unlucky scenario only corrupted elements are extracted from the heap.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Soft heap” as variant on the simple heap data structure that has constant amortized time for 5 types of operations. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current 428-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Soft, heap and variant can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as variant on the simple heap data structure that has constant amortized time for 5 types of operations. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 13, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q7553986. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Soft heap”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Soft heap primary sources, Soft heap archive and Soft research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Soft heap”?
  2. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Soft heap” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.