CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · History & Society

Social responsibility

ethical theory that an entity, be it an organization or individual, has an obligation to act to benefit society at large

Layered newspapers, civic records and oral-history reels arranged as chronological evidence
History and societyInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 1, 2026
Entity authorityQ3427818
Source-derived summary

Social responsibility is an ethical concept in which a person works and cooperates with other people and organizations for the benefit of the community.

An organization can demonstrate social responsibility in several ways, for instance, by donating, encouraging volunteerism, using ethical hiring procedures, and making changes that benefit the environment.

Social responsibility is an individual responsibility that involves a balance between the economy and the ecosystem one lives within, and possible trade-offs between economic development, and the welfare of society and the environment. Social responsibility pertains not only to business organizations but also to everyone whose actions impact the environment.

History

Writers in the classical Western philosophical tradition acknowledged the importance of social responsibility for human thriving.

Aristotle

Aristotle determined that "Man is by nature a political animal."

He saw ethics and politics as mutually-reinforcing: a citizen develops the virtues in large part so that they can contribute to making the polis an excellent and stable one. And the purpose of that was so that the polis would be fertile soil in which a thriving, virtuous citizenry could grow (and in order that there could be an appropriate political context in which one could successfully practice virtues like justice which require a political context).

He believed that the polis is meant to be "a community of equals for the sake of a life which is potentially the best." Some of the virtues in his scheme of virtue ethics, like magnificence and justice were inseparable from a sense of social responsibility.

Ancient Rome

Cicero believed that "In no other realm does human excellence approach so closely the paths of the gods as it does in the founding of new and in the preservation of already founded communities."

In the Meditations of Marcus Aurelius, he wrote that "That which isn't good for the hive isn't good for the bee."

Modern times

In 1953, the book Social responsibility of the businessman, published by the American economist Howard Bowen was one of the first to address the issue of social responsibility as it relates to business activity.

Other cultures

The Japanese have the concept of giri (義理) which includes and transcends the western conception of social responsibility.

Editorial summary

“Social responsibility” enters the record as ethical theory that an entity, be it an organization or individual, has an obligation to act to benefit society at large. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Social, responsibility and ethical can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA strong contextual entry point for chronology, institutions and public events when official records are distinguished from later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1953—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Social, responsibility and ethical.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Social responsibility” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Social, responsibility and ethical provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Chronology, provenance and viewpoint should be read together before a broad social or political interpretation is accepted. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 1, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q3427818. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1953.

Critical limits

Later summaries often reconcile disputed chronology or motive more neatly than the contemporary record permits. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Compare institutional narratives with records created by participants and affected communities. Dates and formal titles are useful anchors, but not substitutes for context.

Best used for
  • Event chronology
  • Institutional context
  • Locating named record creators
Verify next

Contemporary correspondence, government or organizational records, oral histories and cited historical scholarship.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Social responsibility”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Social responsibility primary sources, Social responsibility archive and Social research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Social responsibility”?
  2. What chronology connects this entry to wider political or social change?
  3. Which voices are present, absent or mediated by the institution?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Social responsibility” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.