CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Sober as a Judge

1958 novel

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 18, 2026
Entity authorityQ109238055 ↗
Source-derived summary

Sober as a Judge is a 1958 comedy novel by the British writer Henry Cecil. It is the last in a trilogy that began with Brothers in Law.

Synopsis

Now a high court judge, Roger Thursby presides over a series of unusual cases.

References

Bibliography

Jacob, Merle & Apple, Hope. To be Continued: An Annotated Guide to Sequels. Greenwood Publishing Group, 2000.

Reilly, John M. Twentieth Century Crime & Mystery Writers. Springer, 2015.

Editorial summary

“Sober as a Judge” enters the record as 1958 novel. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Sober, Judge and novel can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewBest approached as a cultural-object dossier: authorship and date matter, but circulation and reception often explain the wider significance. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1958, 2000, 2015—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Sober, Judge and novel.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Sober as a Judge” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Sober, Judge and novel provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Attribution, date and provenance are strongest when supported by the original work, a catalogue record and documented transmission. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q109238055. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1958, 2000 and 2015.

Critical limits

Rights, attribution and provenance may remain disputed even when a general reference summary presents a stable account. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Sober as a Judge”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Sober as a Judge primary sources, Sober as a Judge archive and Sober research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Sober as a Judge”?
  2. Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
  3. How did later circulation or interpretation alter the work’s reception?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Sober as a Judge” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.