CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Sivasmilus

Extinct genus of barbourofelid

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 23, 2026
Entity authorityQ118469371 ↗
Source-derived summary

Sivasmilus is a fossil genus of machairodontine (saber-toothed cat) from the Early or Middle Miocene of Pakistan. It contains one species, Sivasmilus copei, which is known from a single fossil, a partial lower jawbone, that was collected from the Chinji Formation in the Lower Siwaliks. The fossil was originally described in 1915 by British paleontologist G. E. Pilgrim, who assigned it to the prehistoric feline species Sivaelurus chinjiensis. It was subsequently used as the basis of a new genus and species in 1929 by Miklós Kretzoi. Sivasmilus copei was a medium-sized, cat-like animal that weighed between 30 and 50 kilograms (66 and 110 lb) and lived in a swampy forest environment.

History and naming

The holotype and only specimen assigned to Sivasmilus, a partial left mandible labelled GSI-D 151, was collected from the Chinji type locality in the Salt Range of the Siwaliks. The similarly sized holotype of Sivaelurus chinjiensis was also found at this site, which led paleontologist Guy Ellcock Pilgrim to provisionally assign GSI-D 151 to S. chinjiensis when he described the fossil in 1915.

In 1929, American paleontologist William Diller Matthew considered the holotype of Sivaelurus to be distinctly feline, but the mandible fragment GSI-D 151 to be distinctly machaerodont (saber-toothed cat) based on features of the teeth. Hungarian paleontologist Miklós Kretzoi reached a similar conclusion that same year in a wholly separate paper and erected the new genus and species Sivasmilus copei for it; no etymology was given for either name. In his 1932 paper on Siwalik carnivorans, Pilgrim acknowledged this reassignment and agreed with its machaerodont affinities, stating that he had sought to avoid establishing an ill-defined genus when he assigned it to Sivaelurus.

Editorial summary

“Sivasmilus” enters the record as extinct genus of barbourofelid. Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Sivasmilus, Extinct and genus can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1915, 1929, 1932—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Sivasmilus, Extinct and genus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Sivasmilus” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Sivasmilus, Extinct and genus provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 23, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q118469371. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1915, 1929 and 1932.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Sivasmilus”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Sivasmilus primary sources, Sivasmilus archive and Sivasmilus research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Sivasmilus”?
  2. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
  3. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Sivasmilus” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.