CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Siri Jørgensdatter

Norwegian peasant girl prosecuted for witchcraft (born 1717)

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionJun 26, 2026
Entity authorityQ106606920 ↗
Source-derived summary

Siri Jørgensdatter (1717-?) was a Norwegian peasant girl, one of the last people confirmed to have been prosecuted for witchcraft in Norway.

She was interrogated by the authorities in Oppland on the charge of witchcraft, after having confessed to her parish vicar that her grandmother used to take her to Satan's Witches' Sabbath. The vicar reported her to the Bishop and the Governor, which resulted in her being put on trial for sorcery in 1730.

She stated that her grandmother had smeared a pig with ointment and used it to fly with her to Satan, who had given her food and bit her ear, where she was then unable to feel pain. Her grandmother had milked knives which she had stabbed the wall with, and given Siri a cup with ointment she could use for flying. Siri had decided to report herself as a witch, despite protests from the small demons, and reported two women as her accomplices.

Witcraft was still formally illegal in Norway, and only fifteen years prior, Birgitte Haldorsdatter had been judged guilty of sorcery. However, at this point in time, judges were normally sceptical toward witchcraft charges. The court decided that Siri Jørgensdatter had made up the story, which was obviously influenced by the widely publicized Mora witch trials, and the case was therefore dismissed. Siri Jørgensdatter was released and the matter did not go further.

Editorial summary

“Siri Jørgensdatter” enters the record as norwegian peasant girl prosecuted for witchcraft (born 1717). Crown Archives preserves that source wording while asking what Siri, Jørgensdatter and Norwegian can confirm, complicate or overturn.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1717, 1730—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1717. Its strongest next move is a source search built around Siri, Jørgensdatter and Norwegian.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

“Siri Jørgensdatter” is worth following because a concise public description often conceals a longer documentary argument. Here, Siri, Jørgensdatter and Norwegian provides the most credible route into that argument.

Evidence profile

Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q106606920. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1717 and 1730.

Critical limits

A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Siri Jørgensdatter”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Siri Jørgensdatter primary sources, Siri Jørgensdatter archive and Siri research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Siri Jørgensdatter”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Siri Jørgensdatter” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.