CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Places & Architecture

One suiter

A hand in contract bridge, a card game

Architectural plans, a scale model, maps and brass measuring instruments
Places and architectureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionNov 2, 2025
Entity authorityQ7523984
Source-derived summary

In contract bridge, a one suiter is a hand containing at least six cards in one suit. Many hand patterns can be classified as one suiters. Typical examples are 6-3-2-2, 6-3-3-1 and 7-3-2-1 distribution.

One suiters form the cornerstone of preemptive bidding. Weak one suiters with six card length are traditionally opened preemptively at the two level, whilst seven carders are used to preempt at the three level. The modern trend is to lower these minimum length requirements, especially when non-vulnerable. Conventional preemptive openings used to introduce a weak one suited hand include the multi 2 diamonds and the gambling 3NT conventions.

Over an opposing opening, one suiters are usually introduced via a natural overcall.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “One suiter” is a hand in contract bridge, a card game. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through suiter, hand and contract, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA valuable geographic starting point for tracing changing names, boundaries, uses and administrative responsibility. The current 115-word lead offers orientation but no explicit four-digit date, so chronology should not be assumed. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, suiter, hand and contract is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “a hand in contract bridge, a card game” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

The strongest evidence will usually combine a dated visual record with documents produced by the authority responsible for the place. The source revision retrieved here is dated Nov 2, 2025. The linked authority identifier is Q7523984. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.

Critical limits

A single description cannot reconcile every naming convention, rebuilding phase or administrative transfer associated with a place. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Treat names, boundaries and functions as historically changeable. Maps, plans, inventories and administrative records can clarify what the place meant at different dates.

Best used for
  • Historic place names
  • Jurisdictional context
  • Routes into maps and plans
Verify next

Contemporary maps, plans, listed-building records, estate papers and the responsible local or national archive.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “One suiter”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow One suiter primary sources, One suiter archive and suiter research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “One suiter”?
  2. Which earlier names or jurisdictions may reveal additional records?
  3. Which authority defined the place, boundary or structure at the relevant date?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from One suiter” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.