CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Datnioides polota

species of fish

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 17, 2026
Entity authorityQ2910272 ↗
Source-derived summary

Datnioides polota, the silver tigerfish, silver tiger perch, barred tigerfish, four-banded tripletail, four-banded tigerfish or four-barred tigerfish, is a species of ray-finned fish belonging to the family Lobotidae, the tripletails and tiger perches. This fish is found in southern Asia and New Guinea.

Taxonomy

Datnioides polota was first formally described as Coius polota by the Scottish geographer and naturalist Francis Buchanan-Hamilton with its type locality given as the estuaries of the River Ganges in India. In 1853 Pieter Bleeker proposed the genus Datnioides and in 1876 he designated D. polota as its type species. In 2000 Maurice Kottelat determined that the type species of the genus Coius, Coius cobojius, was a junior synonym of Anabas testudineus so Coius is a junior synonym of Anabas, with Datnioides being the correct name for the tiger perch genus. The 5th edition of the Fishes of the World classifies this genus as one of two genera in the family Lobotidae, alongside the tripletails in the genus Lobotes, which it places in the order Spariformes.

Etymology

Datnioides polota has a specific name, polota, which Hamilton did not explain. It is thought to be a local name for this fish in the Ganges of India.

Description

Datnioides polota has its dorsal fin supported by 12 spines and 13 or 14 soft rays while the anal fin contains 3 spones and 8 or 9 soft rays. The maximum published standard length of this species is 30 cm (12 in), although 18 cm (7.1 in) is more typical.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Datnioides polota” as species of fish. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Datnioides, polota and species.

Editorial reviewUseful for establishing the present vocabulary of the subject while preserving a route back to the evidence on which that vocabulary rests. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1853, 1876, 2000—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Datnioides, polota and species providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Datnioides polota”, the useful work is to connect “species of fish” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Stable identifiers, scientific names and standards terminology offer the best bridge between this overview and specialist evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 17, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q2910272. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1853, 1876 and 2000.

Critical limits

Current terminology should not be projected backward without checking the classification used when the underlying evidence was created. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Datnioides polota”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Datnioides polota primary sources, Datnioides polota archive and Datnioides research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Datnioides polota”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Which observation, specimen, dataset or publication supports the account?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Datnioides polota” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.