CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

Siege of Érsekújvár (1663)

1663 siege

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ1470965 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Siege of Érsekújvár, also known as the Siege of Uyvar or the Siege of Neuhäusel, occurred in 1663 when Grand Vizier Fazil Ahmed Pasha, who led the Ottomans, invaded Habsburg Hungary and captured the Hungarian fortress at Érsekújvár (Hungarian: Érsekújvár, German: Neuhäus[e]l, Latin: Novum Castrum, Turkish: Uyvar, modern Nové Zámky in southern Slovakia).

Background

In the first half of the 17th century, a stalemate was reached between the Ottoman Empire and Austrian monarchy. After many peaceful years, however, border clashes began. John Kemény, the Habsburg candidate to the throne of Transylvania, was trying to defeat the Ottoman vassal Michael I Apafi. Although Apafi won the throne with Ottoman support, the Austrians captured the forts of Kolozsvár (now Cluj-Napoca, Romania) and Székelyhíd (now Săcueni, Romania). They also built the fort of Zrínyiújvár (Croatian Novi Zrin) facing the Ottoman fort of Kanije (now Nagykanizsa in Hungary). Meanwhile, the Ottoman Army was marching to Dalmatia in the scope of Cretan War (1645-1669) against Venice. Ottoman Sultan Mehmet IV gave the priority to the Austrian front, and the army changed its course.

Peace talks

The commander of the Ottoman army was Grand Vizier Fazıl Ahmet Pasha (a member of Köprülü family). While he was marching to the Austrian front, the Austrians appealed for peace.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “Siege of Érsekújvár (1663)” as 1663 siege. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA practical starting point whose main value is the path it opens into stronger specialist and primary sources. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1663, 1645, 1669—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. The account is most persuasive where Siege, Érsekújvár and siege can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as 1663 siege. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q1470965. Authority coordinates are 47.983, 18.167. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1663, 1645 and 1669.

Critical limits

The absence of detail may reflect summary conventions rather than a lack of surviving documentation. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Siege of Érsekújvár (1663)”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Siege of Érsekújvár (1663) primary sources, Siege of Érsekújvár (1663) archive and Siege research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Siege of Érsekújvár (1663)”?
  2. Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
  3. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Siege of Érsekújvár (1663)” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.