CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · General Reference

The Siege of Sziget

Hungarian epic poetry, 1651

Cross-disciplinary reference desk with index cards, atlas, dictionary and catalogue
General referenceInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMar 26, 2026
Entity authorityQ286150
Source-derived summary

The Siege of Sziget or The Peril of Sziget (Hungarian: Szigeti veszedelem, Latin: Obsidio Szigetiana) is a Hungarian epic poem in fifteen parts, written by Miklós Zrínyi in 1647 and published in 1651, about the final battle of his great-grandfather Nikola IV Zrinski (Miklós Zrínyi in Hungarian) against the Ottomans in 1566. The epic was originally published within the book Siren of the Adriatic Sea (Hungarian: Adriai tengernek Syrenaia) where it was accompanied by several lyric poems.

Narrative and style

The poem recounts in epic fashion the Battle of Szigetvár, in which a vastly outnumbered Croatian-Hungarian army tried to resist a Turkish invasion. The battle concluded when Captain Zrinski's forces, having been greatly depleted, left the fortress walls in a famous onslaught. Approximately four hundred troops forayed into the Turkish camp. The epic concludes with Zrinski killing Sultan Suleiman I, before being gunned down by janissaries. Being in the epic tradition, specifically modeled on the Iliad and Gerusalemme Liberata, it opens with an invocation, though not of the muse, but of the Virgin Mary, and often features supernatural elements; Cupid even appears in Part XII. Zrinski is compared to Hector several times in the text.

The verse is dodecasyllabic, typically but not exclusively with a caesura after the sixth syllable, resembling the alexandrine verse, organised into quatrains with AAAA rhyme scheme:

Én az ki azelőtt iffiu elmével

Játszottam szerelemnek édes versével,

Küszködtem Viola kegyetlenségével:

Mastan immár Mársnak hangassabb versével

Title

The book is today best known under its long-standing Hungarian title, Szigeti veszedelem, literally "The Peril of Sziget." Zrinski's original Latin title, however, was Obsidionis Szigetianae, literally "The Siege of Sziget." This discrepancy is explained by the fact that 17th-century Hungarian had no distinct word for "siege" (the paucity of contemporary Hungarian vocabulary is, in fact, lamented by Zrinski in the epic's foreword) the modern-day "ostrom" ("siege") was taken from the German sturm at some later date, at which point "veszedelem" took on the exclusive meaning of "peril," thereby changing the apparent meaning of the title. The 2011 English translation was published as The Siege of Sziget, based on the original Latin rather than the later Hungarian title.

Summary

Prologue

The book begins with a short introduction in prose.

Editorial summary

This brief starts where responsible research should: with the source description of “The Siege of Sziget” as hungarian epic poetry, 1651. Everything that follows is an evidence route, not borrowed authority.

Editorial reviewA dependable orientation record for establishing vocabulary, names and a first evidence trail. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1647, 1651, 1566, 2011—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1651. The account is most persuasive where Siege, Sziget and Hungarian can be independently traced.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The subject matters to the general reference register because the source frames it as hungarian epic poetry, 1651. Its deeper value depends on whether names, dates, institutions and citations support that framing.

Evidence profile

Vocabulary and entity names are the principal evidence signals here, because they determine the precision of every later search. The source revision retrieved here is dated Mar 26, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q286150. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1647, 1651, 1566 and 2011.

Critical limits

Overview language is designed for orientation and should not be treated as a substitute for the evidence cited beneath it. The source lead contains qualifying language; that uncertainty should survive quotation, summary and reuse. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.

Best used for
  • Subject orientation
  • Search vocabulary
  • Locating named sources
Verify next

The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “The Siege of Sziget”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow The Siege of Sziget primary sources, The Siege of Sziget archive and Siege research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “The Siege of Sziget”?
  2. Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
  3. What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from The Siege of Sziget” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.