Frank Shubert
Open-knowledge reference entry

Frank Shubert (12 January 1841 – 24 December 1920) was a second lieutenant in the United States Army who was awarded the Medal of Honor for gallantry at the Third Battle of Petersburg in Virginia during the American Civil War.
Personal life
Shubert was born in the Grand Duchy of Hesse, in the modern-day state of Hesse, Germany on 12 January 1841. He immigrated to the United States in 1858 and applied for citizenship in Fonda, New York. He worked for a year on a farm in Palatine Bridge, New York and learned the shoemaking profession in Canajoharie, New York. He married Cecilia M. Lettice Shubert and fathered four children. After the war, he ran a shoe store in Canajoharie that still stands on Church Street. He died on 24 December 1920 and was buried in Prospect Hill Cemetery in Canajoharie.
In 2012, a shawl was discovered that Cecilia Shubert had made for her son. It has since been returned to Shubert's descendants.
Military service
Shubert enlisted in the Army as a sergeant on 15 August 1861 in Canajoharie and was mustered into Company E of the 43rd New York Infantry on 31 August.
Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Frank Shubert” is open-knowledge reference entry. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Frank, Shubert and Open-knowledge, not as a finished interpretation.
Why this record matters
The phrase “open-knowledge reference entry” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.
The citation trail is more important than the brevity of the summary: it shows where individual claims can be examined in context. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 10, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q110485782. 1 of 1 selected statements include explicit references; 0 carry qualifiers and 0 use preferred rank. The first chronological checks are 1841, 1920, 1858 and 2012.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Frank Shubert”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Frank Shubert primary sources, Frank Shubert archive and Frank research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Frank Shubert”?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
- Which cited source is closest to the event, object or claim?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Frank Shubert” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.