CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · People & Ideas

Mathematical Treatise in Nine Sections

mathematical text written by Chinese Southern Song dynasty mathematician Qin Jiushao in 1247

Correspondence, annotated notebooks and portrait silhouettes prepared for research
People and ideasInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionSep 19, 2026
Entity authorityQ997981 ↗
Source-derived summary

The Mathematical Treatise in Nine Sections (simplified Chinese: 数书九章; traditional Chinese: 數書九章; pinyin: Shùshū Jiǔzhāng; Wade–Giles: Shushu Chiuchang) is a mathematical text written by Chinese Southern Song dynasty mathematician Qin Jiushao in the year 1247. The mathematical text has a wide range of topics and is taken from all aspects of the society of that time, including agriculture, astronomy, water conservancy, urban layout, construction engineering, surveying, taxation, armament, military and so on.

This book contains nine chapters:

Da Yan type (Indeterminate equations);

Heaven phenomena

Area of land and field

Surveying

Taxation

Storage of grains

Building construction

Military matters

Price and interest.

Each chapter contains nine problems, a total of 81 problems.

Apart from describing Chinese Remainder Theorem for the first time and providing a constructive proof for it, the text investigated:

Indeterminate equations

"Linglong method" (玲瓏開方; línglóng kāifāng, roughly "method of harmoniously alternating evolution") for numerical solution of algebraic equations, 570 years before Horner's method

Areas and volumes of geometric objects and

Linear system

Like many traditional Chinese mathematical works, the text reflects a Confucian administrator's concern with more practical mathematical problems, like calendrical, mensural, and fiscal problems.

The text existed in manuscript form in 1247, it was incorporated into The Yongle Encyclopedia in 1421; in 1787 the book was collected into the Complete Library of the Four Treasuries, in 1842 appeared in woodblock printed edition. The 19th century British Protestant Christian missionary Alexander Wylie in his article Jottings on the Sciences of Chinese Mathematics published in North China Herald 1852, was the first person to introduce Mathematical Treatise in Nine Sections to the West. In 1971 Belgian sinologist Ulrich Libbrecht published his doctorate dissertation, Chinese Mathematics in the Thirteenth Century, which earned him a degree cum laude at Leiden University.

Notes

References

Guo, Shuchun, "Qin Jiushao". Encyclopedia of China (Mathematics Edition), 1st ed.

Editorial summary

The public source identifies “Mathematical Treatise in Nine Sections” as mathematical text written by Chinese Southern Song dynasty mathematician Qin Jiushao in 1247. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Mathematical, Treatise and Nine.

Editorial reviewA useful biographical orientation record, particularly for establishing names, roles and a first chronology. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1247, 1421, 1787, 1842—that can be checked directly. The linked authority record independently contributes the date 1247. Its value is orientation rather than verdict, with Mathematical, Treatise and Nine providing the first useful test.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Mathematical Treatise in Nine Sections”, the useful work is to connect “mathematical text written by Chinese Southern Song dynasty mathematician Qin Jiushao in 1247” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.

Evidence profile

Chronology provides the most reliable spine for this subject; interpretation should follow only after identities and dates are secure. The source revision retrieved here is dated Sep 19, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q997981. None of the 1 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1247, 1421, 1787 and 1842.

Critical limits

A concise life account rarely captures disputed attribution, private networks or the changing language used to describe a career. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Read biographical claims against dates, named institutions and the cited references. Distinguish a subject’s later reputation from evidence produced during their lifetime.

Best used for
  • Establishing names and roles
  • Building a first chronology
  • Locating cited institutions
Verify next

Personal papers, civil or court records, institutional files and the scholarship cited by the source.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Mathematical Treatise in Nine Sections”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Mathematical Treatise in Nine Sections primary sources, Mathematical Treatise in Nine Sections archive and Mathematical research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Mathematical Treatise in Nine Sections”?
  2. Which claims depend on a single source or contested interpretation?
  3. How has the subject’s reputation changed across later accounts?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Mathematical Treatise in Nine Sections” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.