CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Arts & Letters

Should She Obey?

American 1917 film

Manuscripts, fine bindings, an engraving plate and preserved performance ephemera
Arts and lettersInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionAug 11, 2026
Entity authorityQ102036248 ↗
Source-derived summary

Should She Obey? is an American film released in 1917. It was produced by the Arizona Film Company of Chicago. George Siegmann directed and appears in the film. It is considered a lost film.

The plot about a man who becomes successful leading a mining business and his wife has moralistic overtones. A showgirl steals his love.

Barratt O'Hara served as president of Arizona Film Company.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Should She Obey?” is american 1917 film. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Should, Obey and American, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA useful identification and reception guide that helps separate the work itself from editions, performances, ownership and later interpretation. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1917—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Should, Obey and American is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “american 1917 film” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Reception evidence should be dated and situated: later canonical status may differ sharply from the work’s initial circulation. The source revision retrieved here is dated Aug 11, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q102036248. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1917.

Critical limits

Titles can refer to several editions, objects or performances, making precise identification essential before interpretation. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Separate the work, its editions or performances, and its later reception. Catalogue records, publication histories and object files often preserve different parts of that story.

Best used for
  • Identifying works and editions
  • Tracing reception history
  • Finding collection records
Verify next

The original object or edition, catalogue raisonné, performance record, rights file and holding institution.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Should She Obey?”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Should She Obey? primary sources, Should She Obey? archive and Should research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Should She Obey?”?
  2. Which edition, object, performance or recording is being described?
  3. Where is authorship, date or provenance documented?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from “Should She Obey?” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.