CACrown ArchivesThe cinema collection
Menu
Research dossier · Science & Nature

Sherborne bone

forged paleolithic engraving on an animal rib

Specimen drawers, botanical folios and brass scientific instruments under study light
Science and natureInterpretive dossier study · Crown Archives visual atlas
Record originEnglish Wikipedia
Text licenseCC BY-SA 4.0
Source revisionMay 18, 2026
Entity authorityQ30692845
Source-derived summary

The Sherborne bone is a fragment of animal rib with a horse's head engraved on it, once dated to the Palaeolithic period, but now generally viewed as a modern forgery. The bone was found in 1911 in the rubble of a quarry near Sherborne in Dorset, by two schoolboys from the nearby Sherborne School. They presented it to their science master, Eliot Steel, who in turn sent it to Arthur Smith Woodward at the Natural History Museum, London. After Woodward published the discovery in 1914, its authenticity was the subject of dispute until radiocarbon dating proved that it could not be a genuine piece of Paleolithic art.

In 1994, radiocarbon dating showed that the bone was only about 700 years old. The engraving on it seems to have been inspired by the Robin Hood Cave Horse, a Paleolithic engraving from Derbyshire first published in 1877, and thus was presumably made at the end of the 19th or beginning of the 20th century.

Discovery

In October 1911, Philip Grove and Arnaldo Cortesi, two boys at Sherborne School, presented a bone to their science master, Eliot Steel. Steel said that Cortesi had found it in a quarry near the school, where he had advised the boys that they could find fossils. Ross Jefferson, who had been a student at the Sherborne School a year ahead of Grove and Cortesi, later reported that Cortesi had been about to throw the bone into a fire when he had stopped him and advised him to show it to Steel.

Steel sent the bone to Arthur Smith Woodward at the Natural History Museum, who published it as "an apparent Palaeolithic engraving" of an ancient wild horse (equus przewalski), and observed that it was very similar to the Robin Hood Cave Horse.

Editorial summary

Begin with the source’s own compact description: “Sherborne bone” is forged paleolithic engraving on an animal rib. The dossier treats that line as a proposition to test through Sherborne, bone and forged, not as a finished interpretation.

Editorial reviewA practical orientation to terminology and classification, particularly when read beside dated observations, specimens or technical literature. The current lead gives the account dated anchors—1911, 1914, 1994, 1877—that can be checked directly. The selected authority fields contribute no independent date. For this dossier, Sherborne, bone and forged is the immediate research focus.
Editorial analysis

Why this record matters

The phrase “forged paleolithic engraving on an animal rib” supplies a clear boundary for inquiry. It also exposes the unanswered questions: who defined that boundary, when it became stable and which sources sit outside it.

Evidence profile

Datasets, specimens, observations and peer-reviewed methods provide the appropriate test for the technical claims summarized here. The source revision retrieved here is dated May 18, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q30692845. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference. The first chronological checks are 1911, 1914, 1994 and 1877.

Critical limits

A general summary may omit uncertainty, sample limits or methodological disagreement that is explicit in the technical record. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.

How to read it

Check terminology, classification and the date of the cited evidence. Scientific names and technical consensus can change while older records retain historical value.

Best used for
  • Current terminology
  • Classification context
  • Finding cited technical literature
Verify next

Primary datasets, specimen catalogues, standards bodies and the most recent peer-reviewed literature.

Three-step research path

  1. Establish the record: confirm the title “Sherborne bone”, its source revision and the description used here.
  2. Expand the search: follow Sherborne bone primary sources, Sherborne bone archive and Sherborne research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
  3. Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.

Questions for further research

  1. Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Sherborne bone”?
  2. Has classification or technical consensus changed since the cited source?
  3. Is the terminology current, historical or disputed?
Subject index

Search terms from this dossier

Source & attribution

This entry incorporates text from Sherborne bone” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.