Logarithmic form
meromorphic differential form with poles of a certain kind

In algebraic geometry and the theory of complex manifolds, a logarithmic differential form is a differential form with poles of a certain kind. The concept was introduced by Pierre Deligne. In short, logarithmic differentials have the mildest possible singularities needed in order to give information about an open submanifold (the complement of the divisor of poles). (This idea is made precise by several versions of de Rham's theorem discussed below.)
Let X be a complex manifold, D ⊂ X a reduced divisor (a sum of distinct codimension-1 complex subspaces), and ω a holomorphic p-form on X−D. If both ω and dω have a pole of order at most 1 along D, then ω is said to have a logarithmic pole along D. ω is also known as a logarithmic p-form. The p-forms with log poles along D form a subsheaf of the meromorphic p-forms on X, denoted
Ω
X
p
(
log
D
)
.
{\displaystyle \Omega _{X}^{p}(\log D).}
The name comes from the fact that in complex analysis,
d
(
log
z
)
=
d
z
/
z
{\displaystyle d(\log z)=dz/z}
; here
d
z
/
z
{\displaystyle dz/z}
is a typical example of a 1-form on the complex numbers C with a logarithmic pole at the origin. Differential forms such as
d
z
/
z
{\displaystyle dz/z}
make sense in a purely algebraic context, where there is no analog of the logarithm function.
Logarithmic de Rham complex
Let X be a complex manifold and D a reduced divisor on X. By definition of
Ω
X
p
(
log
D
)
{\displaystyle \Omega _{X}^{p}(\log D)}
and the fact that the exterior derivative d satisfies d2 = 0, one has
d
Ω
X
p
(
log
D
)
(
U
)
⊂
Ω
X
p
+
1
(
log
D
)
(
U
)
{\displaystyle d\Omega _{X}^{p}(\log D)(U)\subset \Omega _{X}^{p+1}(\log D)(U)}
for every open subset U of X. Thus the logarithmic differentials form a complex of sheaves
(
Ω
X
∙
(
log
D
)
,
d
)
{\displaystyle (\Omega _{X}^{\bullet }(\log D),d)}
, known as the logarithmic de Rham complex associated to the divisor D. This is a subcomplex of the direct image
j
∗
(
Ω
X
−
D
∙
)
{\displaystyle j_{*}(\Omega _{X-D}^{\bullet })}
, where
j
:
X
−
D
→
X
{\displaystyle j:X-D\rightarrow X}
is the inclusion and
Ω
X
−
D
∙
{\displaystyle \Omega _{X-D}^{\bullet }}
is the complex of sheaves of holomorphic forms on X−D.
Of special interest is the case where D has normal crossings: that is, D is locally a sum of codimension-1 complex submanifolds that intersect transversely. In this case, the sheaf of logarithmic differential forms is the subalgebra of
j
∗
(
Ω
X
−
D
∙
)
{\displaystyle j_{*}(\Omega _{X-D}^{\bullet })}
generated by the holomorphic differential forms
Ω
X
∙
{\displaystyle \Omega _{X}^{\bullet }}
together with the 1-forms
d
f
/
f
{\displaystyle df/f}
for holomorphic functions
f
{\displaystyle f}
that are nonzero outside D. Note that
d
(
f
g
)
f
g
=
d
f
f
+
d
g
g
.
{\displaystyle {\frac {d(fg)}{fg}}={\frac {df}{f}}+{\frac {dg}{g}}.}
Concretely, if D is a divisor with normal crossings on a complex manifold X, then each point x has an open neighborhood U on which there are holomorphic coordinate functions
z
1
,
…
,
z
n
{\displaystyle z_{1},\ldots ,z_{n}}
such that x is the origin and D is defined by the equation
z
1
⋯
z
k
=
0
{\displaystyle z_{1}\cdots z_{k}=0}
for some
0
≤
k
≤
n
{\displaystyle 0\leq k\leq n}
.
The public source identifies “Logarithmic form” as meromorphic differential form with poles of a certain kind. This brief keeps that definition visible, then builds a research path around Logarithmic, form and meromorphic.
Why this record matters
A short description can identify a subject without explaining its stakes. For “Logarithmic form”, the useful work is to connect “meromorphic differential form with poles of a certain kind” to the records capable of establishing context and consequence.
Named sources, stable identifiers and responsible institutions provide the strongest route from overview to verifiable evidence. The source revision retrieved here is dated Jun 3, 2026. The linked authority identifier is Q6667308. None of the 0 selected statements returned an explicit reference.
A concise general-reference account can conceal disagreements about scope, terminology or the weight assigned to individual sources. The lead is largely declarative, so disagreement and counter-evidence require a deliberate search beyond the opening account. Authority statements aid reconciliation but still require their own references, qualifiers and ranks to be checked.
How to read it
Use the entry as an orientation point, then follow its citations and revision history. Names, dates and institutional relationships should be checked against the original record.
- Subject orientation
- Search vocabulary
- Locating named sources
The closest primary source, responsible institution and strongest cited specialist reference.
Three-step research path
- Establish the record: confirm the title “Logarithmic form”, its source revision and the description used here.
- Expand the search: follow Logarithmic form primary sources, Logarithmic form archive and Logarithmic research across catalogues and specialist indexes.
- Test the account: compare the strongest cited source with the responsible institution’s current record and note any disagreement.
Questions for further research
- Which source most directly establishes the central claim about “Logarithmic form”?
- Which institution is responsible for the underlying evidence?
- What terminology or title could unlock a more precise catalogue search?
Search terms from this dossier
This entry incorporates text from “Logarithmic form” on English Wikipedia. Contributors are listed in the page history. Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License. Selected authority identifiers and statements are retrieved from Wikidata under CC0; their references and qualifiers remain part of the verification path.